Spring and maximum compression time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass-spring system where two masses collide and stick together, leading to a question about the time taken to reach maximum compression of the spring after the collision. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically conservation of momentum and energy in the context of oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy and momentum to analyze the collision and subsequent motion of the masses. There are attempts to calculate maximum compression of the spring and the time taken to reach that compression, with varying interpretations of the principles involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on applying conservation laws, while others question the validity of certain assumptions made regarding energy conservation in the context of the inelastic collision. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the relationship between acceleration and time.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the non-constant nature of acceleration during the compression phase, which may affect the choice of equations used in the calculations. Participants are also navigating the implications of the inelastic collision on the conservation principles applicable to the scenario.

smhippe
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass m1 = 8 kg is at rest on a frictionless horizontal surface and connected to a
wall by a spring with spring constant k = 70 N/m as shown in the figure. A second mass
m2 = 5 kg is moving to the right at vo = 17 m/s. The two masses collide and stick
together. How long will it take after the collision to reach the maximum compression of
the spring?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I just want to make sure I did this right...
So solve for the maximum compression distance using energy conservation. The spring has no energy and there is no energy change for potential gravity. So, 1/2*m*v^2=1/2*k*x^2; solving for x I got 5.75. Next we know F=-kx so ma=-kx; solving for a I got a=-30.96. Putting this into kinematics gives us .55s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By kinematics, do you mean eqns. of uniform acceleration?
 
What was your "v" in 1/2 mv^2??
You need to apply Conservation of Linear Momentum principle in the horizontal direction (as there are no external forces in this direction) to obtain the velocity of the combined mass after collision.
Then obtain the maximum compression "x" at which the combined mass will be at rest, by using Conservation of Mechanical Energy principle (since there are no non-conservative forces here).

Acceleration given by a = (k*x)/m is time-variant as x depends on time.
So, put a = (v.dv)/dx = kx and integrate both sides. Determine the constant by putting x=0, v= velocity of the combined mass obtained. Now you will get v = a function of x. Put v = dx/dt and integrate to obtain x in terms of time t.
This is a direct relation between compression and the time taken for it.
 
Oh I should have seen that before - conservation of energy here in an inelastic collision is wrong.
 
We're only concerned with what happens after the inelastic collision. Conservation of energy is valid then.
 
Yes but I only meant the conservation statement the OP wrote was wrong.
 
Okay so I can plug it into momentum conservation laws to find what the velocity of the combined blocks is. But, does that mean that I can still use energy conservation to figure out how far the spring is compressed after the collision? (I mean 1/2*m*(v^2)=1/2*k*(x^2))
 
Yes. That's correct.
 
Try #2
So from momentum conservation i got the velocity of both blocks to be 10.46 just before they hit the spring. Using that I got the distance that the spring compressed by .5*m*(v^2)=.5*k*(x^2) and got x to be 4.5m. Then using that I used F=-kx=ma and got a=-24.23. From there I just used a simple equation (v)f=(v)i+a*t. I got time to be .43s. Sound right to anyone else?
 
  • #10
Acceleration as pointed earlier is not constant so the eqn. you wrote can not be used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K