Spring and particles in motion problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two particles connected to springs, focusing on their motion along the z-axis and the dynamics of their center of mass. The setup includes parameters such as mass, spring constants, and gravitational effects, with the goal of deriving an equation of motion for the center of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss drawing free-body diagrams and finding the equilibrium position of the center of mass. There are considerations about treating the particles separately or as a combined system. Questions arise about the assumptions regarding spring displacements and the effects of gravity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered methods for analyzing the forces acting on each particle and how to relate their accelerations to the center of mass. There is ongoing exploration of the equations governing the system, with no clear consensus on the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the springs obey Hooke's law and that gravitational acceleration is constant. There is a note of uncertainty regarding the treatment of certain dimensions as vector quantities.

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Here's another Q I'm stuck on:

"Two particles P1 and P2 of equal mass m are connected to springs as in the diagram below.
Q__
/
\
/
* p1
\
/
\
* p2
/
\
/
\
__0

The springs are identical, each having natural length l and modulus [tex]\lambda[/tex]. The fixed point Q is at a height L vertically above the fixed point O (L > 3l). Take the origin of coordinates at O and the z-axis vertically upwards and let c be the z-coordinate of the centre of mass of the particles.

The particles are in motion. Suppose that the particles remain on the z-axis throughout the motion. Show that c satisfies the equation

[tex]\ddot{c} = ( \frac {\lambda L} {2lm} - g ) - \frac { \lambda} {lm} c[/tex]

[You should assume that acceleration due to gravity, g, is constant and that the springs obey Hooke's law throughout the motion.]"

I don't know where to begin on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First draw free-body diagrams and find the location of c at equilibrium.
Notice that if g were 0 , c would be L/2 .

You could treat P1 + P2 + MiddleSpring as one object, but
you might want to treat P1 and P2 separately, at z1 and z2 ...
(c = (z1 + z2)/2 ; c's acceleration is the average of az1 and az2).

displace P1 from its equilibruim by dz1 , displace P2 from equilib by dz2 .
calculate the acceleration of each , then average them.
If you keep your signs straight, you'll see that MiddleSpring causes no acceleration of the center-of-mass since it pulls oppositely on P1 and P2.
 
Hmm, I'm not really too confident as to how to lay out my solution. I'm assuming that the springs have been pulled away from the origin.
Using your method said above, so far I have:

For particle 1

[tex]m \ddot{z}_1 = T_1 - T_2 - mg[/tex]

[tex]m \ddot{z}_1= \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_1 - l) - \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_1 - l) - mg[/tex]

And particle 2

[tex]m \ddot{z}_2 = T_2 - T_3 - mg[/tex]

[tex]m \ddot{z}_2= \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_2 - l) - \frac {\lambda} {l} ( dz_2 - l) - mg[/tex]

Am I on the right lines or is this completely wrong?
 
Last edited:
The centre of mass of the system is c where [tex]c = (z_1 + z_2)/2.[/tex]
Also, [tex]2\ddot c = (\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2)[/tex]

[tex]m\ddot z_1 =T_1 - T_2 - mg[/tex]
[tex]m\ddot z_2 = T_2 - T_3 - mg[/tex]

[tex]m(\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2) = T_1 - T_3 - 2mg[/tex]
[tex]2m\ddot c = T_1 - T_3 - 2mg, \mbox{ putting }2\ddot c = (\ddot z_1 + \ddot z_2)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring1: } T_1 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_1-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}<br /> (-z_1 -l)\ <-- \ (z_1 \mbox{ is -ve})[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring2: } T_2 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_2-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-(z_2 - z_1) - l)\ <-- \mbox{ don't acually need this!}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{Expansion in Spring3: } T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(l_3-l) = \frac{\lambda}{l}((-L + z_2) - l)[/tex]

[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-z_1 - l) - \frac{\lambda}{l}((-L + z_2) - l)[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(-z_1 - l + L - z_2 + l)[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - (z_1 + z_2))[/tex]
[tex]T_1 - T_3 = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - 2c)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Substituting for } T_1 - T_3,[/tex]

[tex]2m\ddot c = \frac{\lambda}{l}(L - 2c) - 2mg[/tex]
[tex]\ddot c = (\frac{\lambda L}{2lm} - g) - \frac{\lambda}{lm}\cdot c[/tex]

I've had to assume that, as a measured dimension, L is a vector quantity and hence negative, rather than a (positive) scalar quantity.

http://img322.imageshack.us/img322/738/eldavidas4zn.th.jpg
 

Attachments

  • eldavidas.jpg
    eldavidas.jpg
    22.3 KB · Views: 400
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K