Spring-mass system with nearest neighbor couplings

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on modeling a spring-mass system with nearest neighbor couplings, where blocks are free to move along the x-axis. The springs connecting the blocks have a spring constant k1, while the outer springs have a stiffness of k2. The equilibrium position of the blocks is determined by the matrix equation derived from the forces acting on each block, which depend on the ratio k1/k2. The total force on each block is expressed as a linear combination of the block positions, leading to a system of equations that can be solved for displacements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spring constants and their effects on force (k1, k2)
  • Familiarity with matrix equations in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in dynamic systems
  • Basic principles of forces in parallel and series spring configurations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of matrix equations for multi-body spring systems
  • Learn about the implications of the ratio k1/k2 on system behavior
  • Explore numerical methods for solving systems of equations in mechanical models
  • Investigate the dynamics of coupled oscillators and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and researchers interested in dynamic systems and spring-mass models will benefit from this discussion.

sapiental
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This problem refers particulary to the model in my attachment.

The blocks are free to move but only along the x-axis. The springs connecting adjacent blocks have spring constant k1, while the two outer springs have stiffness k2. All the springs have a rest lengt of one. Write the matrix equation for the equilibrium position of the blocks and plot the total length of the system as a function of k1/k2

The model of the problem is throwing me off here because I am used to spring systems being fixed to a wall at one end and having something else attached to it on the other end. The way I'm approaching the problem is by finding out the individual force on each block.. F1 + F2 + F3 + F4. However, I keep getting stuck in a loop by trying to focus on an individual block because each block seems dependent on the other ones at all times.

I also can't picture the equation f(k1/k2) at all in my head.

I know it's not much but this is what I have so far.

Springs in a parallel
kp = k1+k2
Springs in a series
1/ks = 1/k1 + 1/k2

The length of the system should be related to the equilibrium length when all springs are at rest.

so:

L_equilibrium = L_1e + L_2e + L_3e

(these are the equilibrium distances between each block)

I'm guessing that the force on each end is something like:

F = -k_springtotal(L_system - L_equilibrium)I would really appreciate it if someone could give me a push start with this problem. I mainly want to understand what force the individual blocks are experiencing if displaced. Also, I don't really understand the question that well either to be completely honest. Particulary the part about finding the length based on the ratio of constants? How do I get the individual forces on each block if I'm not given specific constants for k1 and k2?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • spring.JPG
    spring.JPG
    19.1 KB · Views: 584
Physics news on Phys.org
Number the masses 1 2 3 4 from left to right and call the positions x1 x2 x3 x4

For the top spring, the length is x4-x2, the extension is x4-x2-1, and the forces are -k2(x4-x2-1) applied to block 4 and +k2(x4-x2-1) applied to block 2.

The total force on eack block is the just the sum of the forces from all the springs connected to it. That will be an expression of the form a1 x1 + a2 x2 + a3 x3 + a4 x4 + c, and it equals 0 since the system is in equilibrium.

You are not asked to find the individual forces, only the displacements. Obviously the forces depend on the values of k1 and k2 but the displacements will only depend on the ratio k1/k2.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K