Spring Paradox (apparently). Energy problem with one vertical spring.

  1. Apologies if this is too basic, but I've been studying for a while and I'm stuck.


    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Spring paradox. What is wrong with the following argument?
    Consider a mass m held at rest at y = 0, the end of
    an unstretched spring hanging vertically. The mass is now
    attached to the spring, which will be stretched because of the
    gravitational force mg on the mass. When the mass has lost
    gravitational potential energy mgy and the spring has gained
    the same amount of potential energy so that

    mgy= 1/2 cy2

    the mass will come to equilibrium. Therefore the position of
    equilibrium is given by

    y= (2mg)/C

    2. Relevant equations

    Conservation of total mechanical energy
    [itex]K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2[/itex]

    Potential Energy (gravitational)
    U=mgy

    Potential Energy (elastic)
    1/2 cy2

    Kinetic Energy
    1/2 mv2


    3. The attempt at a solution
    At first glance, I can't seem to figure out what is wrong with the argument. So I began recreating the whole thing.

    I started drawing it this way:
    [​IMG]
    A is the intial situation where the spring is at rest, not supporting the mass. It's just there.
    B is the situation where the mass has been attached to the spring which supports the mass' weight. The blue line depicts y=0.

    Since no non-conservative forces seem to be involved here, I applied the conservation of total mechanical energy, this makes:


    EA=EB
    KA+UA=KB+UB



    Since the A situation is at the assigned zero, both elastic potential and gravitational potential will be 0. It's at rest so kinetic is also 0. In short, EA=0

    0=1/2 cy2 - mgy + 1/2 mv2

    The spring would go up and down and eventually reach equilibrium, where the kinetic energy is zero.

    0=1/2 cy2 - mgy

    So far nothing wrong has been found about the problem given. Because this leads to:

    mgy=1/2 cy2

    And then, solving for y, it becomes

    y= (2mg)/C

    Again, this matches the results given. So I can't find what's wrong. Is it a trick question and nothing is wrong? Am I missing something? Thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dick

    Dick 25,852
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The 'paradox' part is now to consider forces on the balanced mass. The spring exerts a force of cy upwards. Gravity exerts a force of mg downwards. If you put y=(2mg)/c then you conclude the spring exerts a force of 2mg upwards. The forces don't balance. Paradox!
     
  4. *slaps forehead* I should have seen that. O_O

    The paradox is clear now. What's not clear is how did this happen. There are no other forces acting on it. That 2 shouldn't be there. I'm beyond exhausted, going to have to sleep on it. Thank you very much! (It seems weird to say 'thank you very much, Dick', but yeah. Thank you.)
     
  5. Dick

    Dick 25,852
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Good idea. Sleep on it. Dream about what would REALLY happen if there were no other forces acting on the system.
     
  6. Oh wait. If... there are no other forces, wouldn't it oscillate instead of just sitting there? When you release the mass, realistically it would go beyond the equilibrium point then back up, and keep oscillating. I assumed that 'eventually', it would stop moving. But that's only because in reality, oscillators are damped. By friction, usually. So the paradox happens because this system is not really free from non-conservative forces?
     
  7. Dick

    Dick 25,852
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You've got it. It will just oscillate if something is not damping it. If something is damping it, it will stop at the force equilibrium point. Now you can sleep without disturbing dreams.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar discussions for: Spring Paradox (apparently). Energy problem with one vertical spring.
Loading...