Spring problem: compressed and pushed down with a velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling the motion of a mass attached to a vertical spring after it is compressed and then pushed downward with an initial velocity. The spring's force constant was calculated, and the period of oscillation was determined. The correct position function was clarified, emphasizing the need to incorporate both amplitude and phase angle based on initial conditions. The participants discussed the significance of defining a coordinate system and the correct interpretation of signs for displacement and velocity. The consensus is that the initial velocity cannot simply be added to the position equation, as it requires a more complex approach involving the general solution for harmonic motion.
ayjakk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to come up with a problem and solve it. As of right now, I have a vertical spring with an equilibrium length of .38 m hanging. A .61 kg mass is attached to the bottom, and the new equilibrium length is 1.05 m.

If the spring is compressed .1 m upwards then pushed down with a velocity of 4.06 m/s, how would you write position as a function of time, as well as velocity and acceleration?

Homework Equations



Force constant: k = F/x = (mg)/x = (.61 kg * 9.81 m/s^1)/(1.05 m - .38 m) = 8.931 N/M

Period: T = 2pi(m/k)^(1/2)
T = tpi(0.61kg/8.931 N/M)^(1/2) = 1.642 s^-1​

w = 2pif
f = 1/T
x(t) = Acos(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for x(t) without any initial velocity. I came up with w = 3.826 s^-1, and an equation of x(t) = -.1cos(3.826t)
This may be a dumb question, but would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt, where v = 4.06 m/s? What about units? Would it contribute towards angular velocity? Is the -.1 the correct sign for being pushed upwards?

I feel confident taking derivatives, so velocity and acceleration I have no problem with getting. It's just the position function I'd like to clarify first.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made a slight mistake, the general solution for the free harmonic oscillator is x(t)=Acos(wt+\phi). The first derivative will be the velocity v(t). From initial conditions x(0), v(0) you can determine A and \phi. No the initial velocity v(0) doesn't affect w.
 
ayjakk said:
I solved for x(t) without any initial velocity. I came up with w = 3.826 s^-1, and an equation of x(t) = -.1cos(3.826t)
OK, except for that minus sign.

ayjakk said:
This may be a dumb question, but would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt, where v = 4.06 m/s? What about units? Would it contribute towards angular velocity?
The correct approach is outlined by Delta2. Start with the basic equation and solve for the new amplitude and phase angle.

ayjakk said:
Is the -.1 the correct sign for being pushed upwards?
I would choose up as positive, making the initial position +.1. (But the initial velocity is down, and thus negative.)
 
Re relevant equations: that's relevant equations, not to be mixed up with things you bring up in attempt at solution.

Re period: that has the dimension of time, not of time-1

Re solution without initial velocity: define a coordinate system first. If you let the x-axis point downwards and place the origin at the steady state equilibrium point (0.95 m spring length), then yes, -0.1 is the starting postion.

Living upside down is tiring. I advise strongly to let the position axis point upwards. Your choice.

Re solution without initial velocity: ##x(t) = -0.1\; \cos(\omega t)## is correct. You get the velocity as a function of time by differentiating.

Re solution with initial velocity: you go back to the general solution ##x(t) = A\; \cos(\omega t + B)## and fill in the initial conditions for ##x(0)## and ##{dx\over dt}(0)##.

Re
ayjakk said:
would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt
You can not do this: x = vt only applies when ## a = {d^2x\over dt^2} = 0## all the time. That is definitely not the case here !
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
6K