Spring problem: compressed and pushed down with a velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a vertical spring with a mass attached. The original poster is exploring the dynamics of the spring when it is compressed and then pushed down with a specific velocity. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, particularly harmonic motion and forces acting on springs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the position function of the spring as a function of time, questioning how to incorporate initial velocity into the equation. Some participants suggest clarifying the initial conditions and the correct formulation of the position function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the formulation of the position function and the implications of initial conditions. There is guidance on the correct approach to defining the position function, including the importance of the phase angle and amplitude. Multiple interpretations of the coordinate system and sign conventions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the choice of coordinate system and the implications of defining upward or downward as positive. Participants are also addressing potential misunderstandings regarding the relationship between initial velocity and angular frequency.

ayjakk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to come up with a problem and solve it. As of right now, I have a vertical spring with an equilibrium length of .38 m hanging. A .61 kg mass is attached to the bottom, and the new equilibrium length is 1.05 m.

If the spring is compressed .1 m upwards then pushed down with a velocity of 4.06 m/s, how would you write position as a function of time, as well as velocity and acceleration?

Homework Equations



Force constant: k = F/x = (mg)/x = (.61 kg * 9.81 m/s^1)/(1.05 m - .38 m) = 8.931 N/M

Period: T = 2pi(m/k)^(1/2)
T = tpi(0.61kg/8.931 N/M)^(1/2) = 1.642 s^-1​

w = 2pif
f = 1/T
x(t) = Acos(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for x(t) without any initial velocity. I came up with w = 3.826 s^-1, and an equation of x(t) = -.1cos(3.826t)
This may be a dumb question, but would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt, where v = 4.06 m/s? What about units? Would it contribute towards angular velocity? Is the -.1 the correct sign for being pushed upwards?

I feel confident taking derivatives, so velocity and acceleration I have no problem with getting. It's just the position function I'd like to clarify first.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made a slight mistake, the general solution for the free harmonic oscillator is x(t)=Acos(wt+\phi). The first derivative will be the velocity v(t). From initial conditions x(0), v(0) you can determine A and \phi. No the initial velocity v(0) doesn't affect w.
 
ayjakk said:
I solved for x(t) without any initial velocity. I came up with w = 3.826 s^-1, and an equation of x(t) = -.1cos(3.826t)
OK, except for that minus sign.

ayjakk said:
This may be a dumb question, but would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt, where v = 4.06 m/s? What about units? Would it contribute towards angular velocity?
The correct approach is outlined by Delta2. Start with the basic equation and solve for the new amplitude and phase angle.

ayjakk said:
Is the -.1 the correct sign for being pushed upwards?
I would choose up as positive, making the initial position +.1. (But the initial velocity is down, and thus negative.)
 
Re relevant equations: that's relevant equations, not to be mixed up with things you bring up in attempt at solution.

Re period: that has the dimension of time, not of time-1

Re solution without initial velocity: define a coordinate system first. If you let the x-axis point downwards and place the origin at the steady state equilibrium point (0.95 m spring length), then yes, -0.1 is the starting postion.

Living upside down is tiring. I advise strongly to let the position axis point upwards. Your choice.

Re solution without initial velocity: ##x(t) = -0.1\; \cos(\omega t)## is correct. You get the velocity as a function of time by differentiating.

Re solution with initial velocity: you go back to the general solution ##x(t) = A\; \cos(\omega t + B)## and fill in the initial conditions for ##x(0)## and ##{dx\over dt}(0)##.

Re
ayjakk said:
would adding the initial velocity just be x(t) = Acos(wt) + vt
You can not do this: x = vt only applies when ## a = {d^2x\over dt^2} = 0## all the time. That is definitely not the case here !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K