Spring Problem Involving Variables and Constants Only

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a spring problem involving variables and constants, focusing on the relationship between acceleration, force, and energy conservation. The initial attempt uses Newton's second law to derive the spring constant \( k \) and the displacement \( x \), but the official solution requires expressing \( k \) in terms of \( m, g, a, \) and \( h \). Participants highlight the need for clarity in the problem statement regarding the desired variables. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment that re-evaluating the equations helped clarify the relationships between the variables. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
Argonaut
Messages
45
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
An experimental apparatus with mass ##m## is placed on a vertical spring of negligible mass and pushed down until the spring is compressed a distance ##x##. The apparatus is then released and reaches its maximum height at a distance ##h## above the point where it is released. The apparatus is not attached to the spring, and at its maximum height it is no longer in contact with the spring. The maximum magnitude of acceleration the apparatus can have without being damaged is ##a##, where ##a > g##. (a) What should the force constant of the spring be? (b) What distance ##x## must the spring be compressed initially?
Relevant Equations
$$F=ma$$
$$U_{\text{grav}}=mgh$$
$$U_{\text{el}}=\frac{1}{2}kx^2$$
Here is my attempt at the solution:

a) The apparatus may only experience acceleration ##a > g## while in contact with the spring. Since the spring exerts the greatest force when it is the most compressed, the apparatus will undergo the greatest acceleration at that point. So Newton's second law gives
$$\sum F = ma$$
$$kx-mg = ma$$
Therefore, the force constant of the spring should be $$k = \frac{m(a+g)}{x}$$.

b) There are only conservative forces in the system, so energy is conserved. Let point 1 (with ##y=0##) be the point where the apparatus is released and let point 2 be the point where it reaches height ##h##. Then
$$U_1=U_2$$
$$\frac{1}{2}kx^2 = mgh$$
Expressing ##x##
$$x=\sqrt{\frac{2mgh}{k}}$$

However, the official solution at the back of the book is
a)
$$k = \frac{m(g+a)^2}{2gh} $$
b)
$$x = \frac{2gh}{g+a} $$

I could 'reverse-engineer' both solutions. However, I don't understand how I should have known to express ##k## in terms of ##m##, ##a##, ##g## and ##h##, and not ##x##. Is it because of part b? Because essentially, both ##k## and ##x## are target variables and only the rest are known?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Argonaut said:
$$k = \frac{m(a+g)}{x}$$ $$x=\sqrt{\frac{2mgh}{k}}$$
These look good. Can you combine them so that ##k## is expressed in terms of ##m,g, a## and ##h## instead of ##m, g, a## and ##x##?
 
Argonaut said:
how I should have known to express k in terms of m, a, g and h, and not x.
The question ought to have stated, in part a, that the answer should be in terms of m, g, a and h.
I suppose you might have noticed that your answers expressed x in terms of k, then k in terms of x, in such a way that each could be expressed without the other; and since x usually refers to an unknown to be found, and you know k is to be found…
 
TSny said:
These look good. Can you combine them so that ##k## is expressed in terms of ##m,g, a## and ##h## instead of ##m, g, a## and ##x##?
Yes and they give the book solution.
haruspex said:
The question ought to have stated, in part a, that the answer should be in terms of m, g, a and h.
I suppose you might have noticed that your answers expressed x in terms of k, then k in terms of x, in such a way that each could be expressed without the other; and since x usually refers to an unknown to be found, and you know k is to be found…
Got it.

Thanks, both. It makes more sense now that I typed it up and pondered some more.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top