Spring problem using work energy theorem

Click For Summary
A 2.90 kg block attached to a spring is released from rest, and the problem involves calculating its speed after moving 0.0200 m while accounting for friction. The work-energy theorem is applied, where the work done by friction is calculated as the product of mass, gravity, coefficient of friction, and displacement. The user initially miscalculated the work done by friction, mistakenly considering it as positive instead of negative. After correcting the equations and inputting the numbers accurately, the user successfully arrived at the correct speed of 0.414 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the work-energy principle and the sign of work done by friction.
Garrit
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.90 kg block on a horizontal floor is attached to a horizontal spring that is initially compressed 0.0360 m . The spring has force constant 860 N/m . The coefficient of kinetic friction between the floor and the block is 0.35 . The block and spring are released from rest and the block slides along the floor.

What is the speed of the block when it has moved a distance of 0.0200 m from its initial position? (At this point the spring is compressed 0.0160 m)

Homework Equations


I'm using the equation Work( of the nonconservative forces) = Eb - Ea where Eb equals the final kinetic energy plus the final potential energy and Ea equals the initial kinetic energy plus the initial potential energy. I'm calculating kinetic energy using (1/2)mv^2 and for potential energy (1/2)kx^2.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at it:

The work done by friction should equal (mass)(gravity)(coefficient of friction)(displacement) which would equal 2.9(9.8)(0.35)(0.02)

Now for the other side of the equation:

(1/2)(m)vf^2 + (1/2)k(x2)^2 - ( (1/2)(m)vi^2 + 1/2k(x1)^2 )

So this is what I get:

2.9(9.8)(0.35)(0.02) = (1/2)(2.9)(vf)^2 + (1/2)(860)(0.016) - (1/2)(2.9)(0) - (1/2)(860)(0.036)

I punched this into wolfram and got 2. something. I know the answer is 0.414, so I must be doing something wrong. I'm just using the equation I learned in class. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the work done by friction positive or negative?
 
Garrit said:
The work done by friction should equal (mass)(gravity)(coefficient of friction)(displacement) which would equal 2.9(9.8)(0.35)(0.02)
So the friction is adding energy to the block?
 
Ah so the work done by friction should be negative, right? That still doesn't give me 0.414 though. What else is wrong?
 
Garrit said:
1/2k(x1)^2 )

Garrit said:
1/2)(860)(0.036)
Compare.
 
ah man. Even writing out the equations, I still couldn't punch in the numbers right! Thanks so much guys. I made the corrections and got the answer I was looking for!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K