Spring (with mass) kinetic energy -- velocity assumption

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the assumption that velocity decreases linearly in a spring with mass, particularly when one end is fixed. It establishes that if every part of the spring compresses uniformly, the velocity of a particle at a distance x from the fixed end can be expressed as vx/l, where v is the velocity of the free end. The conversation also highlights that for non-uniform springs, a different relationship between distance and speed must be applied, utilizing the spring constant and the concept of effective mass in spring-mass systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spring dynamics and linear mass density
  • Familiarity with the concept of effective mass in spring-mass systems
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations and their application in physics
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of effective mass in spring-mass systems as outlined in the Wikipedia article
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of non-uniform springs and their velocity profiles
  • Learn about the application of differential equations in analyzing spring dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between spring constant and length in various spring configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of spring systems and their applications in real-world scenarios.

ELiT.Maxwell
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
why we assume that velocity decreases linearly in a spring (i.e. if one end is fixed, then velocity of a particle (of spring) at x from fixed =vx/l where v is the velocity of the free end) and why does it hold good too when the spring (linear mass density) is non uniform...

EDIT: spring has mass..
ref : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_mass_(spring–mass_system)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If every part of the spring compresses in the same way, that's the result.
Not all springs are uniform - if they are not, you might need a different relation between distance and speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ELiT.Maxwell and vanhees71
by using spring constant inversely proportional to length and letting a element y from fixed end and Fnet=0 on it so,
K(L/y)x1=K(L/(L-y))x2
where L is the length of spring at any time t, now, y/x1=(L-y)/x2
x1+x2=x these are lim->0 inst changes and x1 = velocity of element and solving eqn , v=y/l(v of free end)

and, since we have not touched linear mass density (only used absolute lengths...) it works
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K