Spring with weight question / Potential energy of the spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy of a spring using Hooke's Law and the work-energy principle. The spring constant (k) is determined to be 40 N/m based on a 20 cm extension caused by a 4 N weight. However, the potential energy for a 12 N weight was incorrectly calculated as 7.2 J instead of the correct value of 3.6 J. The error stems from misapplying the work formula and misunderstanding the equilibrium state of the spring system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Familiarity with potential energy equations, specifically Ue = 1/2*k*r²
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational force and its relation to weight (Ug = m*g*h)
  • Concept of equilibrium in spring systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Hooke's Law and its application in calculating spring constants
  • Study the work-energy principle in the context of spring systems
  • Learn about oscillatory motion and energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Practice problems involving potential energy calculations for springs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy concepts, as well as educators teaching spring dynamics and potential energy calculations.

masterchiefo
Messages
211
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The spring of a dynamo-meter grows 20cm when one suspends a 4N on weight. What is the potential energy of the spring when one suspends a weight of 12N?

Homework Equations


Ue = 1/2*k*r2
Ug= m*g*h

The Attempt at a Solution


so to find k I do this step.
1/2*k*0.22 = 4*0.2
k=40N/M

Now that I have k I can find the potential energy of the spring with 12N
1/2*40*r2 =12*r
I find r to be 0.6
now I do 12*0.6 = 7.2J to fnd the potential energy of the spring.

The real answer is 3.6J but I can't figure out how to get this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you tried to set the PE of the spring equal to the work done by the weight force, but you calculated the work wrong when doing it this way. Try Hookes law to calculate k.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Looks like you tried to set the PE of the spring equal to the work done by the weight force, but you calculated the work wrong when doing it this way. Try Hookes law to calculate k.
I don't understand, I am already using Hookes law to calculate K.

How am I supposed to find K with only this formula W= 1/2*k*r2
I don't have K nor W and only r
 
masterchiefo said:
I don't understand, I am already using Hookes law to calculate K.

How am I supposed to find K with only this formula W= 1/2*k*r2
I don't have K nor W and only r
Write down Hookes law. Solve for k knowing that the spring extends 20 cm in the equilibrium position when the weight is 4 N.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Write down Hookes law. Solve for k knowing that the spring extends 20 cm in the equilibrium position when the weight is 4 N.
Thats Hookes law... W= 1/2*k*r2
4*0.2= 1/2*k*0.22
 
masterchiefo said:
Thats Hookes law... W= 1/2*k*r2
4*0.2= 1/2*k*0.22
No that is not Hookes law. The work done by a spring is the negative of its change in PE which somewhat resembles your equation, but what you want is Hookes law to make life easier, please look it up.
 
As PhanthomJay said, W = (1/2)kr2 is not Hooke's law. You don't want to use W = (1/2)kr2 when calculating the spring constant. (Although you will use it later when calculating the spring's potential energy.)

If you are puzzled as to why this conservation of energy approach does not work for calculating the spring constant k, I might be of help. Using the equation
mgh = (1/2)kh2
Implies the following: Initially, the weight is put on the relaxed spring, then released such that weight falls on its own accord. Eventually, the weight's velocity will momentarily drop back to zero when it falls a distance h below its initial position. At this point in time the initial energy of mgh has been transferred to the potential energy of the spring, (1/2)kh2.

But it won't stop there! The mass will then shoot back up to its initial position and oscillate back and forth like that until frictional forces slowly dampen the oscillation.

So that h that I describe above is not the h that you are looking for.

In this problem, instead of letting the mass fall on its own accord, the mass is gently lowered until it reaches a distance of 20 cm, at which point the system stays in a state of equilibrium (no oscillations). That's where you want to use Hooke's law to find the spring constant. Hooke's law describes force; not potential energy (at least not directly).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhanthomJay

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K