Square of modified Dirac equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the squaring of a modified Dirac equation of the form (iγμμ - M)ψ = 0, where M = m + im5γ5. Participants debate whether to multiply on the left with (iγνν + m + im5γ5) or (iγνν + m - im5γ5). The consensus suggests using (iγνν + m - im5γ5) to eliminate cross terms effectively. The discussion also highlights that the anti-commutation property of γ5 with γμ simplifies the resulting expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its modifications
  • Familiarity with gamma matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of Klein-Gordon equations and their derivation
  • Basic concepts of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gamma matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation from the Dirac equation
  • Explore the implications of mass terms in modified Dirac equations
  • Investigate the role of anti-commutation relations in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying advanced particle physics, particularly those interested in the properties and applications of modified Dirac equations.

cbetanco
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
If I take a modified Dirac Eq. of the form [itex](i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu -M)\psi=0[/itex] where [itex]M=m+im_5 \gamma_5[/itex], and whish to square it to get a Klein-Gordon like equation would I multiply on the left with [itex](i\gamma^\nu \partial_\nu +m+im_5\gamma_5)[/itex] or [itex](i\gamma^\nu \partial_\nu +m-im_5\gamma_5)[/itex]?
I was under the impression that to take the square, you put a minus sign on the mass term and multiply with that expression on the left, but I am unsure if the [itex]im_5\gamma_5[/itex] term should also get the appropriate sign change, since its not the tradition mass term. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I say use iγμμ + m - imγ5. This will eliminate the cross terms.
 
Thanks. I was getting a little worried about the [itex]m_5 \gamma^\nu\partial_\nu\gamma_5+m_5\gamma_5 \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu[/itex] in my expression but [itex]\gamma_5[/itex] anti commutes with [itex]\gamma^\mu[/itex], so it goes away in the end. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K