MHB Squares in a field with q^n elements

Click For Summary
In a field F with q^n elements, the equation y^2 = r has a solution if and only if r^m = 1, where q is an odd prime and q^n = 2m + 1. The non-zero elements of F are part of a cyclic group of order 2m, implying that if y^2 = r, then r^m must equal 1. For the reverse direction, assuming r^m = 1, it can be shown that the element r^{(q^n + 1)/2} serves as a solution to y^2 = r. This establishes the necessary equivalence between the existence of solutions and the condition on r.
Prefer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let $F$ be a field with $q^n$ elements, where $q$ is an odd prime. Write $q^n=2m +1$ with $m \in \mathbb{N}.$

If $r \in F^{\times},$ show that the equation $y^2= r$ has a solution iff $r^m=1.$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Prefer,

Please show what your thoughts are on this problem or where you're stuck. Have you been able to prove one of the directions, e.g., if the equation $ y^2 = r $ has a solution, then $ r^m = 1$?
 
Euge said:
Hi Prefer,

Please show what your thoughts are on this problem or where you're stuck. Have you been able to prove one of the directions, e.g., if the equation $ y^2 = r $ has a solution, then $ r^m = 1$?

I have the direction you mention, so far:

The non-zero elements of $\mathbf F_{q^n}$ are a cyclic group of order $q^n-1=2m$. So, if $y^2=r$, we have $r^m=y^{2m}=1$.
 
Prefer said:
I have the direction you mention, so far:

The non-zero elements of $\mathbf F_{q^n}$ are a cyclic group of order $q^n-1=2m$. So, if $y^2=r$, we have $r^m=y^{2m}=1$.

Ok, great. For the reverse direction, assume $r^m = 1$. Since $q$ is odd, $q^n + 1$ is divisible by $2$. So we may consider $r^{(q^n + 1)/2}$. Show that this element is a solution to $y^2 = r$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
907
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
812
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K