SR - Getting Zero Spatial Displacement

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the calculation of spatial displacement between two events, A and B, which results in zero using one method but not another. The key issue identified is the incorrect assumption that Δx_AB equals vΔt_AB, which only holds true for events with no spatial separation in the reference frame. This misunderstanding leads to discrepancies in the calculations. Clarification is sought on why the first method is flawed, emphasizing the need to consider the conditions under which the equations apply. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate spatial displacement calculations.
A_Stone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: I have tried for some time to understand my error but can't figure it out. Any help will be much appreciated.

Hi!

I'm trying to figure out why the spatial displacement from two events A and B gives zero when I use one method compared to another which doesn't give zero spatial displacement. I have a picture from the calculations below.

SR_Question.jpg


Thanks for any clarification to why the first method is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that ##\Delta x_{AB} = v \Delta t_{AB}##. This is not true. It is only true for events with no spatial separation in ##\bar{\mathcal O}## as those are the events that are separated by ##v \Delta t## in ##\mathcal O##.
 
  • Like
Likes A_Stone and Ibix
Orodruin said:
You are assuming that ##\Delta x_{AB} = v \Delta t_{AB}##. This is not true. It is only true for events with no spatial separation in ##\bar{\mathcal O}## as those are the events that are separated by ##v \Delta t## in ##\mathcal O##.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
820
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
256
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K