SR - Getting Zero Spatial Displacement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the calculation of spatial displacement between two events, A and B, which results in zero using one method but not another. The key issue identified is the incorrect assumption that Δx_AB equals vΔt_AB, which only holds true for events with no spatial separation in the reference frame. This misunderstanding leads to discrepancies in the calculations. Clarification is sought on why the first method is flawed, emphasizing the need to consider the conditions under which the equations apply. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate spatial displacement calculations.
A_Stone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: I have tried for some time to understand my error but can't figure it out. Any help will be much appreciated.

Hi!

I'm trying to figure out why the spatial displacement from two events A and B gives zero when I use one method compared to another which doesn't give zero spatial displacement. I have a picture from the calculations below.

SR_Question.jpg


Thanks for any clarification to why the first method is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that ##\Delta x_{AB} = v \Delta t_{AB}##. This is not true. It is only true for events with no spatial separation in ##\bar{\mathcal O}## as those are the events that are separated by ##v \Delta t## in ##\mathcal O##.
 
  • Like
Likes A_Stone and Ibix
Orodruin said:
You are assuming that ##\Delta x_{AB} = v \Delta t_{AB}##. This is not true. It is only true for events with no spatial separation in ##\bar{\mathcal O}## as those are the events that are separated by ##v \Delta t## in ##\mathcal O##.
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top