Finding the Spring Constant: Angular Velocity vs Hooke's Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the discrepancies in measuring the spring constant (k) using various methods, including Hooke's Law, oscillation with force and position sensors, and timing the period of oscillation. The participant observed that values derived from angular velocity and acceleration were approximately 25% lower than those obtained from other methods. Key methods included graphing force over displacement and using the formula k=4π²m/T². The participant seeks clarification on potential errors in their calculations and the assumptions that may lead to these differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its application in measuring spring constants.
  • Familiarity with oscillation principles and the relationship between period, mass, and spring constant.
  • Knowledge of graphing techniques for force versus displacement and position versus time.
  • Basic concepts of angular velocity and angular acceleration in the context of harmonic motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the derivation and application of Hooke's Law in experimental settings.
  • Learn about the relationship between angular frequency and spring constant in oscillatory motion.
  • Explore methods for accurately measuring displacement, velocity, and acceleration in spring experiments.
  • Review the principles of harmonic motion and how they relate to the calculation of spring constants.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, experimental researchers, and educators interested in understanding the principles of spring mechanics and the accurate measurement of spring constants.

Robert Hilderman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
THIS HOMEWORK WAS POSTED IN ANOTHER FORUM, SO NO TEMPLATE
So I'm doing an experiment where I am using five different methods to find the spring constant of a spring. These three values of k should be the same but alas, they are not :( and I am at a loss as to why. The first method was by using hooke's law and finding the displacement and graphing the applied force over displacement (I called this method 1 in the picture below). Method 2 was oscillating the spring attached to a force sensor and having a position sensor under it. I graphed Force over Position (I had the force sensor zeroed at the spring's equilibrium so "position" was the spring's displacement). Method 5 was timing the period of the oscillation and plugging that into k=4pi^2m/T^2. All these methods gave a similar experimental value of k. However, when I used the position vs. time data to find k using angular velocity/acceleration, my values were 25% lower. My calculations are in the picture below. I used the maximum displacement, velocity, and acceleration values which were derived from the graphs. What I'm wondering is 1) did I do something wrong? and if not 2) what assumption is made that makes these values so off. Thank you so much. (In the picture, I accidentally called angular velocity "angular frequency". My bad)
dsf.PNG
Capture.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume 0.0765m is the amplitude of oscillation. How did you measure acceleration?
I don't understand the v/x calculation. The x seems to be the amplitude again, but what is v here? The max velocity? If so, how measured?
What value did you measure for the period?

Edit: why do you refer to angular velocity and angular acceleration? Isn't this just a mass bouncing up and down on the end of a suspended spring?
Any idea what the mass of the spring was?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
761
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K