Srednicki QFT chapter 67, LSZ formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transition from equation (67.3) to (67.4) in Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory" regarding the LSZ formula for scalar fields. The LSZ formula is expressed as &langle f|i &rangle = i \int d^{4}x_1 e^{ik_1 x_1} (\partial^{2} + m^{2}) \ldots &langle 0|T\phi(x_1)\ldots|0\rangle, which is shown to be equivalent to &langle f|i &rangle = \lim_{k_i \to m^2} (-k_1^{2} + m^{2}) \ldots &langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(k_1)\ldots|0\rangle. The limit arises from the need to handle the delta function's behavior when integrating over all values of q_1, particularly when q_1 = k_1 leads to an indeterminate form. Srednicki's approach involves allowing momenta to be slightly off-shell to resolve these singular terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the LSZ reduction formula in quantum field theory.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of on-shell and off-shell momenta.
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms in the context of quantum fields.
  • Basic grasp of correlation functions and their role in scattering amplitudes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the LSZ formula in Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory".
  • Learn about the implications of on-shell versus off-shell conditions in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the concept of delta functions in integrals and their role in scattering theory.
  • Investigate the treatment of singularities in correlation functions and their contributions to scattering amplitudes.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum field theorists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on scattering processes and the LSZ reduction formula.

physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I would like to know how to get from eq. (67.3) to (67.4) in Srednicki's book on QFT. The problem is the following:
Given the LSZ formula for scalar fields
[itex]\langle f|i \rangle = i \int d^{4}x_1e^{ik_1x_1}(\partial^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\phi(x_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
This is supposed to be equivalent to:
[itex]\langle f|i \rangle = \lim_{k_i\to m^2} (-k_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(k_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
where [itex]\widetilde{\phi}(k) = i \int d^4x e^{ikx} \phi(x)[/itex] an [itex]k^2=m^2[/itex] is not fixed.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


Especially, I don't understand where the limes comes from. Here my attempt:
[itex]\langle f|i \rangle = i \int d^{4}x_1e^{ik_1x_1}(\partial^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\phi(x_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
[itex]=\int d^{4}x_1e^{ik_1x_1}(\partial_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T \int\frac{d^4q_1}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-iq_1x_1}\widetilde{\phi}(q_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
[itex]=\int d^{4}x_1\int\frac{d^4q_1}{(2\pi)^4}e^{i(k_1-q_1)x_1}(-q_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(q_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
[itex]=\int{d^4q_1}\delta^4(k_1-q_1)(-q_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(q_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
[itex]=(-k_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(k_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/itex]
[itex]=\ldots[/itex]

So, I am missing the limes in the last expression. Can it simply be introduced in the end since the on shell condition fixed [itex]k_1^{2}=m^{2}[/itex] before ?
Why isn't [itex]-k_1^{2}+m^{2}=0[/itex] true here? Is it because we are considering an interacting theory?

Very best, physicus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not 100% certain, but here's my guess.

If you take [tex]k_i^2 = -m^2[/tex] through all of the steps you've shown, you get a problem here:

[tex]\langle f|i \rangle =\int{d^4q_1}\delta^4(k_1-q_1)(-q_1^{2}+m^{2})\ldots \langle 0|T\widetilde{\phi}(q_1)\ldots|0\rangle[/tex]

where as you integrate through all values of q_1, you get zero from the delta function unless q_1 = k_1, but when q_1 = k_1, then the term

[tex]-q_1^{2}+m^{2}[/tex]

still makes the integrand go to zero. In fact, the product of the delta and the above term at q_1 = k_1 is sort of like an indefinite form infinity*0 inside the integrand, so you sort of need to choose a prescription for dealing with it.. In your steps, you let the delta function take precedence, but then your last line must be identically zero for on-shell momenta. Srednicki works through this by letting the momenta be a little off-shell.

If you follow through the steps after 67.4, you'll see that Srednicki is also using this sort of limit thing to show how he's considering these effectively "singular terms" in the correlation function to be the only contributors to the scattering amplitude, so you let the momenta go on-shell eventually and take residues.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K