Srednicki QFT chapter 8 question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft Srednicki
LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

In chapter 8 Srednicki employs the [tex]1-i \epsilon[/tex] trick. He multiplies the Hamiltonian desity,

[tex]H=\frac{1}{2} \Pi^2+\frac{1}{2}(\nabla\phi)^2+\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2[/tex]

by this [tex]1-i \epsilon[/tex], and says it's equivalent to if we replaced m^2 with [tex]m^2-i \epsilon[/tex]. I can't see how this is?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He explains this in detail in the earlier chapter on the harmonic oscillator.
 
In chptr 7, it's completely different,

[tex]H(P,Q)=\frac{P^2 m^{-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 Q^2[/tex]

So multiplying by [tex]1-i\epsilon[/tex], gives :

[tex]H(P,Q)=\frac{P^2 (1-i\epsilon)m^{-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{2}(1-i\epsilon) m\omega^2 Q^2[/tex]

So directly you can see this is equivalent to if we used [tex]m^{-1} \rightarrow (1-i\epsilon)m^{-1}[/tex] and [tex]m\omega^2 \rightarrow (1-i\epsilon)m\omega^2[/tex]

I fail to see how to perform in a similar process to get Srednicki's mass substitution for the H in my first post. Thanks.
 
Hi LAHLH,

I would recommend not trying to take Srednicki's comment too literally. A useful point of view is the following. The purpose of the [tex]i \epsilon[/tex] is to get the pole structure right in the propagator. To make sense of what Srednicki is saying, try to determine if modifying only the mass by [tex]i \epsilon[/tex] is sufficient to modify the pole structure so that integrating along the real line is the "right" contour.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K