SSSI (structure-soil-structure interaction)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ocky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around software recommendations for analyzing structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) in the context of a master's project. Participants share their experiences with various software tools and methodologies relevant to civil and mechanical engineering applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about suitable software for analyzing SSSI, listing options such as ABAQUS, OpenSees, SAP2000, and FLUSH.
  • Another participant shares a positive experience using SAP2000 for a silo collapse investigation, noting its effectiveness in modeling structural failures.
  • A follow-up question asks about the other software options mentioned and expresses interest in the capabilities of ABAQUS and OpenSees, particularly regarding their coding requirements.
  • One participant reflects on their long search for effective soil modeling techniques, expressing frustration with limitations imposed by civil engineering practices and suggesting a conceptualization of soil as a hydraulic fluid.
  • A resource is shared that lists various seismic SSSI applications, with a note that the choice of software may depend on whether the foundations are piles or shallow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants share individual experiences with different software, but there is no consensus on a single best option for SSSI analysis. Multiple viewpoints and experiences are presented, indicating a range of preferences and methodologies.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the software mentioned, and there are references to specific applications and limitations in modeling soil behavior, which may affect the analysis outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in civil and mechanical engineering, particularly those interested in software tools for structural analysis and soil interaction modeling.

ocky
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am doing a masters in SSSI and I am a mechanical engineer so a lot of this stuff is all new to me (manly civil engineering based masters) so I have a question for the pros. (I will also do some analysis on SSI (soil-structure interaction)

What is a good software to use to analyse this project.

At the momment I am looking into:

-ABAQUS
-open sees
-SAP2000
-FLUSH

cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I used SAP for a silo collapse investigation once and it worked well.

It was basically a huge water tank elevated with a bunch of steel beams, and was designed to not collapse from the type of hit it took.

I think it modeled what happened very well, and was I was able to find the source of the critical failure (one bad weld).
 
ok thanks mate have you used any of the other programmes I have posted? So far I have had a look at abaqus ( which looks pretty good very similar to ansys but with a good civil and geotech part as well ) and I have had a look at OpenSees which looks like it would be good once you learn the ins and outs of the coding (open source coding ). was your hit Earth moving or similar?
 
For 30 yrs l looked for a good way to model dirt. Never found it. Civil engineers never let me put more than 2000 psf into the ground, but I've gone as high as 80,000. So I think of dirt as a very thick hydraulic fluid that I must constrain to support my equipment like a hydraulic cylinder. Anyone else ever do anything like that?
 
Here is a site with many seismic SSI apps

http://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/list?a=1056&start=1

However, since you're mechanical, I'm guessing that could be your forcing function. I'll need to dig more for low strain SSI, as it is somewhat different.

DYNA5 comes to mind, also GTstrudl is used, I've used SAP2000.

Also it matters if your on piles or using shallow foundations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K