• SofiaB
In summary: The hand calculated stresses are about 10% higher than the FEA values. This might be indicative of a lack of joint rigidity in the model.
SofiaB
TL;DR Summary
Hello everyone! I am just trying to verify if the results I obtained for my truss behaviour analysis are correct
Hello everyone!
I am analysing an 18 m per 1.2 m truss, simply supported, with 140x5 chords and 90x8 braces. I then loaded the superior nodes with 500 KN. The top nodes were also laterally constrained to prevent out-of-plane displacements.
After imputing the structure in Abaqus (FEA software), I obtained the load-displacement curves in the top nodes where the concentrated loads were applied. I should note that I am doing a nonlinear analysis with a nonlinear material(S355).
What I found weird was the abrupt drop in the curve after yielding, as well as the fact that the value of the yielding strength seems very small. Can someone help me understand if this behaviour is correct? I will leave some pictures of the truss, the material input and the load-displacement curves for each node for better understatement.

Should also note that ultimately what I am studying is the joints behaviour (in a further analysis I will increase their rigidity) and thus I want to explore the behaviour above the yield limit.

#### Attachments

• aaaaa.PNG
7.2 KB · Views: 151
• 7.PNG
20.5 KB · Views: 182
• Inked0_LI.jpg
16.3 KB · Views: 148
• 8.PNG
19.5 KB · Views: 169
I like to look at a deformed geometry plot on all of my FEA analyses. Possible failure modes of a truss include plastic buckling of a compression member, elastic (Euler) buckling of a compression member, plastic yielding of a tension member, lateral buckling of the top member (which you restrained), and joint failure. The deformed geometry plot shows this, and is also useful as a check on your restraints and loads. And on how well you model joint rigidity, when you get that far.

It's also a good idea to do a hand calculation for the truss element that yielded or buckled.

Last edited:
SofiaB
jrmichler said:
I like to look at a deformed geometry plot on all of my FEA analyses. Possible failure modes of a truss include plastic buckling of a compression member, elastic (Euler) buckling of a compression member, plastic yielding of a tension member, lateral buckling of the top member (which you restrained), and joint failure. The deformed geometry plot shows this, and is also useful as a check on your restraints and loads. And on how well you model joint rigidity, when you get that far.

It's also a good idea to do a hand calculation for the truss element that yielded or buckled.
There were no signs of buckling as well as joint failure which I also found a little weird. I will leave some pictures of the deformed configuration and von mises stress values.

#### Attachments

• Capturedeform.PNG
20.5 KB · Views: 135
• Capturedeform2.PNG
17.3 KB · Views: 121
The deformed geometry plot needs to be scaled such that the peak deformation is larger and more visible. Typical FEA defaults make the peak deformation about 10% of the truss depth. You might need to put a scale factor in there.

Are the end supports simple supports, or rigid? It makes a difference. One end support should restrain in both horizontal and vertical directions, the other should restrain in the vertical direction only. Both should restrain in the out of page direction.

This is a simple truss to analyze by hand. What is the hand calculated stress in the top and bottom members near the middle of the truss and away from the joints? How does that compare to the FEA values?

SofiaB

## 1. What is truss behaviour?

Truss behaviour refers to the way in which a truss structure responds to external forces and loads. This includes how the truss deforms and how it distributes the load among its members.

## 2. How is the load-deformation curve of a truss determined?

The load-deformation curve of a truss is determined by subjecting the truss to different loads and measuring the resulting deformation. This data is then plotted on a graph to show the relationship between load and deformation.

## 3. What factors can affect the load-deformation curve of a truss?

The load-deformation curve of a truss can be affected by various factors such as the material properties of the truss members, the geometry of the truss, the type and magnitude of the applied load, and the boundary conditions of the truss.

## 4. What does the slope of the load-deformation curve represent?

The slope of the load-deformation curve represents the stiffness of the truss. A steeper slope indicates a higher stiffness, meaning the truss can resist larger loads without deforming significantly.

## 5. How does the load-deformation curve help in truss design?

The load-deformation curve is an important tool in truss design as it helps engineers determine the maximum load a truss can withstand before failure, as well as the amount of deformation that will occur under different loads. This information is crucial in ensuring the truss is designed to meet the required safety and performance standards.

• Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
467
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
542
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
4K
• General Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
895
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
685
• Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
• Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
• STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
2
Views
1K
• General Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K