How do I separate the real and imaginary parts of an infinite product?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around separating the real and imaginary parts of an infinite product of complex-valued functions. Participants explore the implications of convergence for the product and the representation of its components in terms of the individual factors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces a complex-valued function defined as an infinite product and seeks closed form expressions for its real and imaginary parts.
  • Another participant suggests that closed form expressions may not be feasible for infinite products and proposes expressions for the real and imaginary parts of the partial product instead.
  • Closed forms for the partial products are provided, involving sums over sequences of binary numerals and the real and imaginary parts of the individual factors.
  • A question is raised regarding the notation used for sequences of binary numerals in the context of the sums for the partial products.
  • A participant discusses the representation of the product in terms of polar coordinates, suggesting that the real and imaginary parts can be derived from the magnitudes and angles of the factors.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the lack of known formulas for the real and imaginary parts of the Gamma function, sharing their personal challenges in finding such expressions and the potential usefulness of these formulas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of obtaining closed form expressions for the real and imaginary parts of the infinite product, with some proposing alternative approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence and utility of specific formulas for the Gamma function.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about convergence and the nature of the functions involved are not explicitly stated, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps related to the Gamma function.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
TL;DR
Just polling to see if anybody knows
Suppose you have a complex-valued function of a complex variable (namely, ##z=x+iy, \, \, x,y\in \mathbb{R}##) defined as the assumed convergent infinite product

$$F(z)=\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}f_{k}(z)$$

Further suppose ##F(x+iy)=u(x,y)+i v(x,y)##, where u and v are real-valued functions.
How to write “closed form” expressions for u and v in terms of the ##f_k##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what you mean by closed form. An infinite product would generally not be considered a closed form.
Perhaps what you are after are expressions for ##U_k(z)## and ##V_k(z)##, which are the real and imaginary parts of the partial product ##F_k(z)\triangleq \prod_{j=1}^k f_k(z)##. If the infinite product in the OP is convergent then we would expect ##U_k## and ##V_k## to be convergent, to functions ##U,V:\mathbb C\to \mathbb R##, such that ##F(z)=U(z)+iV(z)##.
Closed forms for the partial products are:
$$U_k(z) = \sum_{s\in \{0,1\}^k} r_u(h(s))\prod_{j=1}^k
u_j(z)^{1-s_j} v_j(z)^{s_j}$$
$$V_k(z) = \sum_{s\in \{0,1\}^k} r_v(h(s))\prod_{j=1}^k
u_j(z)^{1-s_j} v_j(z)^{s_j}$$
where ##h(s) = \left(\sum_{j=1}^{\mathrm{length}(s)} s_j\right) \mod 4##
##r_u(m)## is 1 if ##m=0##, -1 if ##m=2## and 0 otherwise
##r_v(m)## is 1 if ##m=1##, -1 if ##m=3## and 0 otherwise
##u_j(z)## and ##v_j(z)## are the real and imaginary parts of ##f_j(z)##.
 
What does the notation ##s\in\left\{ 0,1\right\}^k## mean?
 
It means the sum is for s ranging over all elements of the set ##\{0,1\}^k##, which is the set of all sequences of ##k## numerals each of which is either 0, or 1. The set contains ##2^k## different sequences. ##s_j## denotes the ##j##th numeral in sequence ##s##.
 
Assuming the infinite product converges: If you can write each factor zn of the infinite product as zn = rn en (where of course rn > 0 and θnR), then you know that Re(product) = r cos(θ) and Im(product) = r sin(θ), where r = ∏ rn and θ = ∑ θn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
I take a particular interest in the Gamma function, and I'm curious why I've never read any formulas for the real and imaginary parts of the Gamma function in any of my reading. Granted I have only read things in library books and websites and the texts I personally own, I do not have access to pay maths journals and such, but wouldn't these be useful to someone? I personally cannot get WolframAlpha to output these formulae as if either I do not know how to ask it for them or it does not know them (I did pay for it as a phone app, idk if that matters but I imagine they would need to make a business decision as to what constitutes premium content so perhaps it does matter but only thing I've noticed is that certain sep-by-step solutions you need to pay for). I've attempted to write out expressions for ##\Re \left[ \Gamma (x+iy)\right]## and ##\Im \left[\Gamma (x+iy)\right]## but ran into a few things I did not know how to deal with yet, still learning I guess. Is it that expressions for these are known but not particularly useful? I searched NIST's website as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K