Solving Composite Functions: Understanding the Addition Rule for Division

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding composite functions and the addition rule for division, specifically focusing on the functions defined as \( f(x) = 2x + 3 \) and \( g(x) = \frac{x^2}{3} \). Participants are examining the calculations and definitions related to these functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the addition of +3 in the calculations and whether it should instead involve division by 3. There is also uncertainty about the definitions of the functions and their implications for the calculations of \( g(4) \) and \( f \circ g(4) \).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested potential typos in the original question, while others are verifying the calculations based on the definitions provided. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several participants are contributing clarifications and corrections.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of possible errors in the original problem statement, as well as references to external resources that may contain inaccuracies. Participants are also discussing the implications of these errors on their understanding of the functions involved.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


18.png
and
18.png


Find
18.png
,
18.png
and
18.png


2. The attempt at a solution

18.png
means work out
18.png
, then work out
18.png
for this value.

18.png


18.png


so
18.png


18.png


18.png


I do not understand why we add + 3 in line before last (2 x 16 + 3)
Should it not be divided by 3 as it is
18.png
which means 3 x g(x) = x^2

I am a little stuck on the reason why?
 

Attachments

  • 18.png
    18.png
    692 bytes · Views: 493
  • 18.png
    18.png
    761 bytes · Views: 519
  • 18.png
    18.png
    637 bytes · Views: 486
  • 18.png
    18.png
    630 bytes · Views: 497
  • 18.png
    18.png
    617 bytes · Views: 516
  • 18.png
    18.png
    637 bytes · Views: 506
  • 18.png
    18.png
    554 bytes · Views: 242
  • 18.png
    18.png
    818 bytes · Views: 259
  • 18.png
    18.png
    1 KB · Views: 248
  • 18.png
    18.png
    836 bytes · Views: 233
  • 18.png
    18.png
    1 KB · Views: 253
  • 18.png
    18.png
    734 bytes · Views: 243
  • 18.png
    18.png
    700 bytes · Views: 225
  • 18.png
    18.png
    761 bytes · Views: 227
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what they're doing with the ##+3## either but ##3g(x) = x^2## so ##g(x) = x^2/3## and ##g(4) = 16/3##, not 16. And ##f \circ g(4)## would be twice the value of ##g(4)##, definitely not 35.

Neither the calculation for ##g(4)## nor ##f[g(4)]## is consistent with the definitions you showed. Are you sure you have the right solution for the right question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natasha1
I suggest a typo in the question. It should read f(x)=2x+3 g(x)=x2.
It would be most unusual to define g implicitly as 3g(x)=x2 instead of g(x)=x2/3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natasha1
Spot on haruspex, thank you to you both!
 
Thank you! How did you do that?
 
That's great, well done!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
971
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K