What is the stability proof for a PI controller in a formation flying system?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the stability proof for a proportional integral (PI) controller used in a formation flying system with two satellites affected by differential drag. The user seeks assistance in proving the stability of their controller, which aims to maintain the satellites' formation by minimizing the along-track position error. Suggestions include exploring Ragazzini's method for guaranteed performance and analyzing the system's pole locations in the s-plane through locus plots. Understanding the relationship between pole locations and stability requires knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODE) and Laplace transforms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of stability analysis in nonlinear systems.
fernandoz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have two satellites flying in formation geverned by the equations of motion including J2 and drag. Now, one of the satellites has more drag than the other so they become appart. I designed a controller (proportional integral) which meassures the along track position between them and gives Thrust values so the error, which is the difference in the along ttrack position between different orbits, will be zero (that means they will still fly in formation)
I have to give a stability proof for the controller, someone can help me? (the equations governing the system are nonlinear, of course).

thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are various techniques to design a controller. If you want guaranteed performance try searching for Ragazzini's method and of course I'm assuming you are trying to design a discrete controller.
 
Last edited:
If you insists on using a PI controller to see if it's stable you'll have to get the locus plot of the system (plant + controller) and see where the poles are located in the s-plane.

If you are puzzled as to why the poles' locations determine stability then you'll have to study ODE (as a good starting point) and its connection to Laplace transform.
 
Last edited:
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
67
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K