Starburst seen from points of light in night photographs

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MotoMike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of starburst effects in night photography, specifically how the number of spikes in the starburst correlates with the number of aperture blades in a lens. It is established that when using an even number of blades, the starburst exhibits the same number of spikes as the blades due to overlapping diffraction patterns, while an odd number results in double the spikes. The conversation highlights the optical principles at play, including diffraction and symmetry, and suggests that the interaction of light with the aperture blades is responsible for this effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic photography concepts, particularly aperture settings.
  • Familiarity with diffraction and its effects on light.
  • Knowledge of lens construction and blade configurations.
  • Basic principles of optics and light behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of light diffraction and its mathematical models.
  • Explore the impact of different aperture shapes on starburst effects.
  • Study the optical properties of lenses with varying blade counts.
  • Learn about advanced optics concepts, such as the geometry of diffraction patterns.
USEFUL FOR

Photographers, optics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of light behavior in photography, particularly those looking to enhance their understanding of lens effects and starburst phenomena.

MotoMike
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
Hi
been a while, but you guys always square me away.

I've recently noticed that when a night time photo is taken with the aperture closed down, (higher f number) seen in the resultant image is a starburst radiating from points of light. The general wisdom is that it is cased by diffraction over the aperture blades. accepting that that is true, why does the resulting starburst exhibit the same number of spikes as the number of aperture blades if they are an even number, but double the number of spikes as the aperture blade number if they are an uneven number.

I've looked in the photo forums and though discussed it is not really explained.

Kind regards,
Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MotoMike said:
why does the resulting starburst exhibit the same number of spikes as the number of aperture blades if they are an even number, but double the number of spikes as the aperture blade number if they are an uneven number.
I would have to say that in the even case they are overlapped, meaning it is always double, it is just that the opposites coincide.
 
this makes some sense to me. Can you explain just what the light is doing to present this result? I can see it bending around the aperture blade and creating one spike but why the opposite? is it a function of the optics beyond the aperture blades? In lenses that have nine blades, the aperture seems almost round to me and I wonder what it is about the intersection of the blades that light finds different than the space where they do not intersect?
 
Yes, the reason why you see the even/odd effect is from symmetry: even numbered means the two opposite sides of the bright spots' diffraction patterns coincide. The math is not too difficult to work out, the diffraction pattern of a square aperture is standard (advanced) undergrad homework problem. Going to hexagons, heptagons, etc involves a little more geometry but isn't an unreasonable problem. Going from straight blades to curved blades, OTOH, would be rather tedious.
 
Andy I appreciate your help. I hate to admit that the advanced undergrad math is probably beyond me. I am just an old curious guy. I am not in a physics program, just curious about what causes this to happen. In my mind I likened it to rf passing over a knife edge being diffracted into the shadow area behind the knife edge. My previous readings on that subject never indicated that it diffracts in other directions. Light being a higer frequency form of energy, I expected it to diffract and result in the one spike of the starburst when passing over the aperture blade, but was surprised to see it also appear on the opposite side. When Jerromyjon suggested that it always produced the two spikes, it made perfect sense to account for seeing double the number from an odd blade count. All that said, is it possible to explain what is happening without doing the math?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K