Statement about Forbidden Alpha decay transitions.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi, I'm confused about a statement about the change in final/initial states of the daughter/parent atom in an alpha decay. It is the following;

"The spin between the parent ([itex]I_i[/itex]) and daughter ([itex]I_f[/itex]) can change by [itex]lh[/itex] (h being h-bar, l is the orbital angular quantum number of the alpha particle), where;

[itex]\vec{I_i} = \vec{I_f} + \vec{l}[/itex]

and the parity changes by [itex](-1)^l[/itex]
"

I'm confused because if, for example, we take the initial state of the parent to be [itex]0^+[/itex], then there are the following cases;

[itex]\vec{I_i} = \vec{I_f} + \vec{l}[/itex] means

[itex]|\vec{I_i}| = |\vec{I_f} + \vec{l}|[/itex]

Coupling angular momentum together would surely mean that the total orbital quantum number would be of multiple values;

[itex]L = I_f + l, I_f + l - 1, I_f + l - 2, ... I_f - l[/itex]

So if [itex]I_i = 0^+[/itex] we could have multiple [itex]I_f[/itex] for a given [itex]l[/itex]. For example [itex]l = 1[/itex], then

[itex]L = I_f + 1, I_f , I_f - 1 = I_i = 0[/itex]

Meaning [itex]I_f[/itex] could take on values [itex]0[/itex] or [itex]1[/itex]. My notes seem to suggest only the [itex]I_f = 1[/itex] state is possible. Am I looking at this in completely the wrong way? I think I don't fully understand what it means by "can change by [itex]lh[/itex]", what is the signficance of the "can" change?

I looked on the internet and in my textbook, not much to a detail that I can understand. Beta decay forbidden decays seemed to be the closest I could find which might explain it but I don't know how applicable it is to this situation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mfb said:
##I_i=0## gives ##|\vec{I_f}+\vec{l}|=0##, which has the solution ##\vec{I_f}=-\vec{l}## only.

Ah yes clearly. I should've realized that. Here's a better example which might help me understand it for general [itex]l[/itex] and [itex]I_f[/itex].

Say the initial state was [itex]I_i = 1^+[/itex]. We must have the coupled orbital angular momentum quantum number [itex]L[/itex] equal to [itex]1[/itex]. Then say the alpha particle had [itex]l = 2[/itex]

The coupled orbital angular momentum quantum number of

[itex]\vec{I_i} = \vec{I_f} + \vec{l}[/itex]

Would be

[itex]L = I_f + l, |I_f + l - 1|, |I_f + l - 2|, ... |I_f - l|[/itex]

So if we had [itex]I_f = 3[/itex]

[itex]L = 5,4,3,2,1[/itex]

Corresponding to a possibility to have [itex]L = 1[/itex]

If we had [itex]I_f = 2[/itex]

[itex]L = 4,3,2,1,0[/itex]

Corresponding to another possibility to have [itex]L = 1[/itex]

And lastly; If we had [itex]I_f = 1[/itex]

[itex]L = 3,2,1[/itex]

Corresponding to another possibility to have [itex]L = 1[/itex]So in a transition from a state [itex]1^+[/itex] with the emission of an alpha with [itex]l = 2[/itex], it's possible to have 3 final states for the daughter ([itex]3^-, 2^-, 1^-[/itex])? Is this correct?