\eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay (Why this decay is forbidden by J?)

  • Thread starter Alex_Rob
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Decay
In summary, the decay of eta into pi0 and photon is forbidden by C parity and statistics. This is because the initial state has a spin 0 particle and the final state has a spin 0 particle (pi0) and a spin 1 particle (photon), resulting in an antisymmetric wavefunction which violates Bose statistics. In contrast, the rho particle has a spin 1 and can decay into two pi0 particles because they have the same spin. Furthermore, the eta particle has a J=0 state while the final state has a J=0 and a J=1 particle, making it impossible for the orbital angular momentum to be 0, which is required for a symmetric wavefunction. This can also be seen semiclass
  • #1
Alex_Rob
1
0
Decay \eta\to\pi^0\gamma is forbidden by C parity. But why this decay is also forbidden by statistics (J)?

pi^0 spin is 0
photon spin is 1

But there are can be different situations with full orbital angular momentum of pi^0\gamma.
J=L+S and must be 0. Look like L is 0. But why? Why we can't have L=1 in this case? (unlike in \rho\to\pi^0\gamma decay)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would say that your first has spin 0, while the product has a spin 0 particle and a photon which is a spin 1 particle.
 
  • #3
If you put it in a J=1 state the total wavefunction is antisymmetric, and it has to be symmetric because of Bose statistics. [quoting from Vanadium 50 in the ref. link]

rho is a J=1 particle. It can't decay though to pi0 pi0. A similar question has be asked/answered here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-cant-rho-o-decay-into-two-pi-o.278578/
 
  • #4
Again I am saying that the rho has J=1, so angular momentum conservation does not prohibit it to decay in a J=1 + J=0 particle.
The eta has J=0. And you try to make it decay into a J=1 and a J=0 particle? you can't compare these.
It's not only the CG coefficients, keep reading the conversation.

If you try to make the last configuration of pi0 and gamma to have a total angular momentum 0, then you have to set the orbital angular momentum of the two products to be L=1.
But then you are having an antisymmetric wavefunction describing your boson final states
 
  • Like
Likes Alex_Rob
  • #5
I think this is much easier to see semiclassically: you are asking if a 0- --> 0- + radiation state is possible. It is not. A 0- state can have only monopole moments, and there are no magnetic monopoles, and the electric monopole is simply charge: zero in this case. Since no moment changes, there can be no radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes Alex_Rob

What is the \eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay?

The \eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay is a type of particle decay where an eta meson (\eta) decays into a neutral pion (\pi^0) and a photon (\gamma).

Why is this decay forbidden by J?

This decay is forbidden by J, or angular momentum, because the initial and final particles have different spin states. Since angular momentum must be conserved in a decay process, this decay is not allowed.

What is the significance of \eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay?

This decay is significant in studying the fundamental interactions of particles and helps to better understand the strong nuclear force.

Can this decay occur in certain circumstances?

Yes, this decay can occur in certain circumstances, such as in nuclear reactions or in high-energy collisions where there is enough energy to allow for violation of angular momentum conservation.

How is \eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay related to other types of decays?

This decay is related to other types of decays, such as \eta\to\pi^+\pi^- and \eta\to 3\pi, as they involve the same initial and final particles. However, the specific decay mechanism and the particles involved in the intermediate steps may differ.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
997
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top