Static and kinetic friction involving velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a suitcase being dropped onto a conveyor belt, with a focus on the static and kinetic friction forces acting on it as it transitions from rest to moving with the belt's speed. The relevant coefficients of friction and the mass of the suitcase are provided, along with the conveyor belt's velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between force, distance, and work, questioning how these concepts apply to the problem. There is discussion about the work-energy theorem, conservation of mechanical energy, and the role of kinetic and potential energy in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the problem, with some participants offering hints and guidance on using the work-energy theorem. There is an ongoing exploration of how to relate work done to changes in kinetic energy and the effects of friction, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the initial and final velocities of the suitcase, as well as the implications of friction on mechanical energy. The problem's setup and the assumptions about energy conservation are under scrutiny.

enrijuan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A baggage handler drops your 7.00 kg suitcase onto a conveyor belt running at 2.30 m/s. The materials are such that µS= 0.410 and µK= 0.250.

Homework Equations



How far is your suitcase dragged before it is riding smoothly on the belt?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know f=µS(Fn) and doesn't apply once sliding occurs. I also know that F=ma.



I really have no idea how to begin.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi enrijuan! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a mu: µ :wink:)

hint: the variables you have or want are F (force) and d (distance), so you can use … ? :smile:
 
I know that force over distance is work but I don't see how that would help me in this problem... I am sorry I am having a hard time with this one... I also know that d= vt
 
enrijuan said:
I know that force over distance is work but I don't see how that would help me in this problem...

i assume you meant force times distance is work?

(never use "over" that way in maths or physics! :redface:)

ok, now use the work-energy theorem …

work done = change in mechanical energy :smile:
 
doesnt the conservation of mechanical energy talk about potential and kinetic energy?
I don't understand how I would get potential energy or how work would help me in the problem.
 
enrijuan said:
doesnt the conservation of mechanical energy talk about potential and kinetic energy?
I don't understand how I would get potential energy or how work would help me in the problem.

yes, mechanical energy is KE plus PE, but the work-energy theorem applies even if the PE is zero (or doesn't change) …

(btw, this isn't conservation of mechanical energy … mechanical energy is lost when there's friction :wink:)

in this case, work done = change in KE + change in PE

= change in KE + 0 :smile:
 
so,
work done= (7.00 kg)(2.3 m/s) + 0?

then work done =18.515 J
then 18.515=(force due to kinetic friction)(distance)?
 
enrijuan said:
so,
work done= (7.00 kg)(2.3 m/s) + 0?

then work done =18.515 J
then 18.515=(force due to kinetic friction)(distance)?

you''re very confused :confused:

on the LHS you need work done, which as you say is (force due to kinetic friction)(distance)

(the distance is the unknown that you have to find)

on the RHS you need the change in KE, which is … ? :smile:
 
oh the end velocity is goin to be zero right?
so,
1/2mvf2-1/2mvi2=W

1/2mvf2-1/2mvi2 = (µmg)(d)

is this right?
 
  • #10
then,
.5(7)(0)-.5(7)(2.3^2)= (.250)(7)(-9.81)d ?

then d=1.08 meters ?
 
  • #11
enrijuan said:
oh the end velocity is goin to be zero right?

actually, not in this case …

the question has deliberately put it the other way round, with the initial speed being zero, and the final speed being the same as that of the belt! :smile:

(of course, it doesn't make any difference to the size of the change :wink:)
so,
1/2mvf2-1/2mvi2=W

1/2mvf2-1/2mvi2 = (µmg)(d)

is this right?
enrijuan said:
then,
.5(7)(0)-.5(7)(2.3^2)= (.250)(7)(-9.81)d ?

then d=1.08 meters ?

yes! :smile:

(though you could have canceled every m in the equation, and saved yourself multiplying by all those 7s! :wink:)
 
  • #12
wow thank you so much! thanks for the welcome, the µ, the help, and above all the patience!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K