Static cable car, approximate tensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding approximate expressions for the tensions T1 and T2 in a static cable car system, under the conditions where h/d << 1 and h/x << 1. The problem involves analyzing the forces acting on the cable car and deriving expressions based on given equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial equations for T1 and T2, with some questioning the presence of a spurious term in the equations. There are attempts to rearrange the equations for better approximation using binomial expansion. Others express difficulty in the rearranging process and seek hints to proceed.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants sharing their attempts at rearranging the equations and approximating the square roots involved. Some have provided feedback on each other's expressions, and there is a recognition of the need to clarify the maximum tension the cable can withstand. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the maximum tension and the conditions under which it occurs.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of approximating for small values of h and are discussing the implications of these approximations on the derived tensions. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the maximum tension is correctly identified and justified within the context of the problem.

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find approximate expressions for T1 and T2 that are
valid when h/d << 1 and h/x << 1

Homework Equations


[tex]T_{1} =\dfrac{mg\left(d-x\right)}{dh}\sqrt{1+\dfrac{x^{2}}{h^{2}}}[/tex]
[tex]T_{2} =\dfrac{mgx}{d}\sqrt{1+\dfrac{\left(d-x\right)^{2}}{h^{2}}}[/tex]
[tex]h^{2} =\dfrac{\left(L^{2}-d^{2}+2dx\right)^{2}}{4L^{2}}-x^{2}=\dfrac{\left(L^{2}-d^{2}\right)\left(L^{2}-d^{2}+4x\left(d-x\right)\right)}{4L^{2}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure where to begin!
 

Attachments

  • q4a.png
    q4a.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 512
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a spurious h in the denominator in your first equation. I assume it's a typo.
Since you want approximation for small h, rearrange things so that the surds take the form ##\sqrt{1 + \frac{h^2}Z}## for suitable Zs. Then you can use the binomial expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
Hi, thanks, the h is spurious.
I am looking at rearranging things now.
James
 
Having a bit of a block with the rearranging, any hints?
 
bobred said:
Having a bit of a block with the rearranging, any hints?
##\sqrt{1+\dfrac{x^{2}}{h^{2}}} = \frac 1h \sqrt{x^{2}+h^{2}}##. Can you do the next step?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
I get that, thanks, and I get

[tex]T_{1} =\frac{mg\left(d-x\right)}{h}\sqrt{\frac{x^2}{d^2}+\frac{h^2}{d^2}}[/tex]
 
bobred said:
I get that, thanks, and I get

[tex]T_{1} =\frac{mg\left(d-x\right)}{h}\sqrt{\frac{x^2}{d^2}+\frac{h^2}{d^2}}[/tex]
That's not the form you want. You don't want ##x/d## inside the radical. You want a 1 in there. You have
$$\frac 1h \sqrt{x^2+h^2}.$$ Factor something out of the radical so that one of the terms is 1 and the other is <<1.
 
So is this right

[tex]\frac{1}{hx}\sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}}[/tex]
 
bobred said:
So is this right

[tex]\frac{1}{hx}\sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}}[/tex]
You have the right expression inside the square root, but you made a mistake in the extracted factor.
When you've corrected that, do you understand what to do to get rid of the square root by making an approximation?
 
  • #10
Should it be this?

[tex]\frac{x}{h}\sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}}[/tex]

The square root can be expanded by a binomial expansion

[tex]\left(1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}\right)^{1/2}=1+\frac{1}{2}\,{\frac {{h}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}-\frac{1}{8}\,{\frac {{h}^{4}}{{x}^{4}}}+\frac{1}{16}<br /> \,{\frac {{h}^{6}}{{x}^{6}}}-{\frac {5}{128}}\,{\frac {{h}^{8}}{{x}^{8<br /> }}}+{\frac {7}{256}}\,{\frac {{h}^{10}}{{x}^{10}}}[/tex]

given that [itex]\frac{h}{x}\ll1[/itex] would it be

[tex]\sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}}\approx1[/tex]
 
  • #11
If you wanted to do that, you could have gotten the same result much more simply:
$$\sqrt{1+\frac{x^2}{h^2}} \cong \sqrt{\frac{x^2}{h^2}} = \frac{x}{h}.$$ Typically, you keep at least the first-order term of the expansion, i.e.,
$$\sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}} \cong 1 + \frac 12 \frac{h^2}{x^2}$$ so that
$$\sqrt{1+\frac{x^2}{h^2}} = \frac xh \sqrt{1+\frac{h^2}{x^2}} \cong \frac xh \left(1 + \frac 12 \frac{h^2}{x^2}\right).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
  • #12
Thanks for the help.
I need to show that the cable can withstand a tension of

[tex]\frac{mgd}{4h}[/tex]

I have tried many things but cannot get the expression.
 
  • #13
bobred said:
Thanks for the help.
I need to show that the cable can withstand a tension of

[tex]\frac{mgd}{4h}[/tex]

I have tried many things but cannot get the expression.
You need to post at least one updated attempt. Then we can see where you are going wrong.
 
  • #14
Hi

I thought maybe adding the magnitudes of both [tex]T_1[/tex] and [tex]T_2[/tex] but that didn't work.
 
  • #15
bobred said:
I need to show that the cable can withstand a tension of
[tex]\frac{mgd}{4h}[/tex]
I don't think that's quite what you mean. Let me guess:
The diagram represents a cable car moving across. As it moves, the angles, distances and tensions change. The car hangs from a wheel on the cable which is in rolling contact with the cable, so the tensions in the two parts of the cable need not be the same (because there is a static friction force).
You are asked to show that the maximum tension on any part of the cable is [itex]\frac{mgd}{4h}[/itex].
If so, there is no reason to be adding the two tensions. You only need consider one tension and its maximum value. By symmetry, the other will have the same maximum value.
Please post your expression for T1 after making the approximation discussed. How will you find its maximum?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
  • #16
Hi, after posting last night I was laying in bed thinking along those lines.
At the half way point [itex]x=d/2[/itex], substituting into [itex]T_1[/itex]

[tex]T_1=\frac{mg(d/2)(d-d/2)}{dh}\left( 1 + \frac{h^2}{2(d/2)^2} \right)=\frac{mgd}{4h}\left( 1 + \frac{2h^2}{d^2} \right)[/tex]

so as [itex]\frac{h}{d}\ll1[/itex] then the expression in brackets is approx 1 so

[tex]T_1=T_2=\frac{mgd}{4h}[/tex]

Therefore the cable must be able to support this tension.
Thanks
 
  • #17
bobred said:
Hi, after posting last night I was laying in bed thinking along those lines.
At the half way point [itex]x=d/2[/itex], substituting into [itex]T_1[/itex]

[tex]T_1=\frac{mg(d/2)(d-d/2)}{dh}\left( 1 + \frac{h^2}{2(d/2)^2} \right)=\frac{mgd}{4h}\left( 1 + \frac{2h^2}{d^2} \right)[/tex]

so as [itex]\frac{h}{d}\ll1[/itex] then the expression in brackets is approx 1 so

[tex]T_1=T_2=\frac{mgd}{4h}[/tex]

Therefore the cable must be able to support this tension.
Thanks
Yes, that's good. However, you've not shown that this is the maximum tension it will be subjected to. It's not clear to me whether you are supposed to show that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
  • #18
It doesn't, but showing why would be a good idea.

For [itex]T_1[/itex] taking the approximation into account

[tex]T_1=\frac{mg(d-x)}{dh}[/tex]

taking the first derivative wrt [itex]x[/itex] and making this equal zero the value for [itex]x[/itex] is [itex]d/2[/itex] so half way along the cable where [itex]T_1=T_2[/itex]
 
  • #19
bobred said:
It doesn't, but showing why would be a good idea.

For [itex]T_1[/itex] taking the approximation into account

[tex]T_1=\frac{mg(d-x)}{dh}[/tex]

taking the first derivative wrt [itex]x[/itex] and making this equal zero the value for [itex]x[/itex] is [itex]d/2[/itex] so half way along the cable where [itex]T_1=T_2[/itex]
Good. But does that show it is a maximum there?
 
  • #20
No, differentiating again gives a negative result, showing a maximum.
 
  • #21
bobred said:
No, differentiating again gives a negative result, showing a maximum.
Great. (Sorry - didn't notice you'd replied before.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K