Static/kinetic friction problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a crate being dragged across a floor, requiring calculations related to static and kinetic friction, as well as the application of Newton's Second Law. The original poster presents two parts to the question: determining the minimum force required to start moving the crate and calculating the initial acceleration once it is in motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve both parts of the problem but encounters difficulties with the second part regarding the initial acceleration. Participants discuss the importance of significant figures and the potential for arithmetic errors in calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaged in troubleshooting the calculations. Some suggest re-evaluating the arithmetic and retaining more decimal places in intermediate steps. There is acknowledgment of differing answers among peers, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a website providing feedback on the answers, which may be influencing the participants' concerns about accuracy. The original poster expresses frustration over the discrepancies in results and the need for clarification on the method used.

Hiche
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 68 kg crate is dragged across a floor by pulling on a rope attached to the crate and inclined 17° above the horizontal. (a) If the coefficient of static friction is 0.45, what minimum force magnitude is required from the rope to start the crate moving? (b) If μk = 0.39, what is the magnitude of the initial acceleration (m/s^2) of the crate?

Homework Equations



Equations of static and kinetic friction; Newton's Second Law.

The Attempt at a Solution



I managed to answer the first question and it was true. The value is 277.66 N. The second part, I have a problem with:

So, after the crate starts moving, a kinetic friction is present. F(kinetic) = μk * N, where N = mg - F(min)sin@ (previous part). The answer is 228.23. Then according to Newton's law, Fcos@ - f(kinetic) = ma. We compute a and the answer is 0.54. But the website is saying perpetually that the answer is wrong. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't read over your math carefully at all but you seem to have a good grasp of what youre doing. If its a website that is saying the answer is wrong, always make sure you're using the correct amount of significant digits. Also, you didn't put the units in your answer, maybe they want units too.
 
They provide the units so it can't be that. And they are asking for only two or three digits after the decimal point. I showed it to some people and they reached slightly different answers, such as 0.73 which is also wrong. It's pretty vexing.
 
Hiche said:
We compute a and the answer is 0.54. But the website is saying perpetually that the answer is wrong. What did I do wrong?
Redo your arithmetic retaining more intermediate digits. The value I get is a little different than yours, just enough to mess up an online system.
 
I reached a value of 0.502 somehow; wrong. I don't know. I guess I'll have to try more. Maybe I have something mixed up in my method.

Thanks for the replies.
 
This is still bugging me. I tried more values after the decimal point, but nothing. I'm sorry to have brought this back up, but I really need the answer.
 
Hiche said:
This is still bugging me. I tried more values after the decimal point, but nothing. I'm sorry to have brought this back up, but I really need the answer.
It's not a question of more decimal points in your answer, but along the way to getting your answer. I don't know how many sig figs your system requires, but at least the first two digits are required. I recall getting an answer close to yours, but different in the second digit.

(I have no idea if that's the issue with your system, but my guess is that's what's wrong. You gave two answers: 0.54 and 0.502. Rounded to two places, the answer I got didn't match either.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K