Static pressure tubes vs pitot tubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris J
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Chris J
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
I've noticed when measuring static pressure in a duct most people use L shaped tubes with small holes in the sides, very similar to a pitot tube except it's missing the hole in the end for dynamic pressure.

What is the reason for using an L tube with holes in the sides for static pressure alone? Wouldn't just a connection into the side of the duct generally provide a fairly accurate measurement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chris J said:
What is the reason for using an L tube with holes in the sides for static pressure alone? Wouldn't just a connection into the side of the duct generally provide a fairly accurate measurement?
It should, but it would require a second hole and probe. I've also seen L shaped static pressure probes though, and I think they want to be a little away from the side of the duct so there's no weird effects from the boundary layer or roughness.

https://www.contractingbusiness.com/service/article/21212881/secrets-of-the-static-pressure-tip
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action and Chris J