Statistical Thermodynamics/I need a physics genius

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around statistical thermodynamics, specifically focusing on probability distributions of particles in a defined space and the application of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in atmospheric gases. The original poster presents two challenge questions related to these topics, seeking assistance in understanding the underlying principles and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the probability calculations for different distributions of particles in a room, questioning how to derive these probabilities using binomial distribution and Stirling's approximation. They also discuss the implications of atmospheric gas ratios at different altitudes, with some uncertainty about how these ratios are affected by changes in pressure and temperature.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas, with participants providing insights into the calculations needed for the first question and questioning assumptions about the second. Some participants suggest methods for evaluating probabilities, while others express confusion about the implications of atmospheric changes. No consensus has been reached, but the discussion is progressing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions the context of a class assignment with a time constraint and the possibility of receiving help. There is an acknowledgment of the need to leave answers in terms of a large number of particles (N), which influences the calculations discussed.

Remy34
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Here are to challenge questions given to the class to answer to be turned for a free slice of pizza. We have to days, and he said we can get help, and I'm taking him at his word. Here they are.

1). Suppose a room is divided into the front fifth, the middle fifths, and the back two fifths. What is the ratio of the probabilities of finding a 20%:40%:40% split in the particles (the most likely distribution), as opposed to a 19.9%:40.2%:39.9% split.( Assume all the particles are identical. . (Leave answer in terms of N, the total number of particles. But recognize that N is a
large number)

2). Consider the case of a gas in the atmosphere. Assume that the temperature is constant. Basd on the maxwell Boltzmann distribution, at sea level the atmosphere contains 78.1% N2m 21% O2, 0.9% argon and 0.036 CO2. What are the ratios at the top of Everest?




relevant equations
Boltzmann-Maxwell.


The Attempt at a Solution



For The first one. Probability of finding a 20%:40%:40% split: 1
Probability of finding a 19.9%:40.2%:39.9% split= 19.9/20*39.9/40= 0.9925125

For the second, I don't even know where to begin. I know the probability is supposed to be lower (right?), but that is about it.

I know we're still going to get the pizza, but this bothering me to no end. I have to know it, and this why I joined, and will hopefully contribute in turn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remy34 said:
For The first one. Probability of finding a 20%:40%:40% split: 1
Probability of finding a 19.9%:40.2%:39.9% split= 19.9/20*39.9/40= 0.9925125

How did you come up with these numbers?

Consider a simpler case, where the room is split into two equal parts. Then the probability of a random particle finding itself on either side is 1/2. Use binomial distribution to write the probability of having N1 particles on one side and N-N1 on the other, then somehow evaluate this for a large N (use the Stirling approximation, or just raw power and wolfram alpha)

Remy34 said:
For the second, I don't even know where to begin. I know the probability is supposed to be lower (right?), but that is about it.

What do you mean probability is supposed to be lower? Of course air pressure is lower on top of Everest, but you're asked for relative fractions. So they still sum up to 1. Would you expect the ratios of different gases to be different? What physical properties might affect the ratio?
 
Ok I see what you did. I gather from what you said is that I should do the following:

N!/(N1!(N-N1)!)=20%

(N-N1)!/(N1!(N-N1-N2)!)=40%

Right?

As for the second one, I have no idea how to approach, but you are right. The probabilities would still have to add to one. I was only thinking about the amount, which will change, right?

And thanks for bothering to respond.
 
Remy34 said:
N!/(N1!(N-N1)!)=20%

(N-N1)!/(N1!(N-N1-N2)!)=40%

Right?

No no, you want to calculate those expressions, for when N1 = 0.2N or 0.199N, and N2 = 0.4N or 0.399N. And you also need to remember to include the intrinsic probabilities for each slot;
So
[tex]P(N, N_1, N_2) = \left(\frac{1}{5}\right)^{N_1} \left(\frac{4}{5}\right)^{N-N_1} \frac{N!}{N_1!(N-N_1)!} \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{N-N_1} \frac{(N-N_1)!}{N_2!(N-N_1-N_2)!}[/tex]

right? (check I didn't make any stupid mistakes there) Then you "just" need to calculate [tex]\frac{P(N, 0.199N,0.399N)}{P(N,0.2N,0.4N)}[/tex]
 
clamtrox said:
No no, you want to calculate those expressions, for when N1 = 0.2N or 0.199N, and N2 = 0.4N or 0.399N. And you also need to remember to include the intrinsic probabilities for each slot;
So
[tex]P(N, N_1, N_2) = \left(\frac{1}{5}\right)^{N_1} \left(\frac{4}{5}\right)^{N-N_1} \frac{N!}{N_1!(N-N_1)!} \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{N-N_1} \frac{(N-N_1)!}{N_2!(N-N_1-N_2)!}[/tex]

right? (check I didn't make any stupid mistakes there) Then you "just" need to calculate [tex]\frac{P(N, 0.199N,0.399N)}{P(N,0.2N,0.4N)}[/tex]

Thanks for that. But I suppose you can't calculate, seeing as you don't know what N is. I know that because N is big, we can use Sterlings Aprox. but why bother going the extra step?

As for the second question, how do you even begin?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K