Statistics conceptual questions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ukitake Jyuushirou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Statistics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around foundational concepts in statistics, particularly focusing on probability, its definitions, and implications. Participants explore various interpretations of probability, the implications of infinite trials, and the application of Borel's Law in hypothetical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that probability ranges from 0 to 1 and cannot exceed these bounds, while others seek clarification on what constitutes "any range of numbers."
  • There is contention regarding the statement that a probability greater than 0 will eventually occur given infinite time, with some participants arguing that this is not necessarily true.
  • Participants discuss Borel's Law, with some suggesting it implies that small probabilities are negligible, while others clarify that it relates to setting a cutoff for realistic occurrences based on conditions.
  • The hypothetical scenario of a monkey typing out Hamlet raises questions about the nature of probability and possibility, with some arguing that it is theoretically possible but not guaranteed.
  • There is a discussion about non-random determinants in evolution, with references to natural selection as a factor that influences outcomes.
  • Participants inquire about the definitions of "probable" and "possible" in statistical terms, indicating a desire for deeper understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of probability, particularly regarding infinite trials and the interpretation of Borel's Law. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of probability concepts, the dependence on hypothetical scenarios, and the need for clearer definitions of terms like "probable" and "possible." Some statements rely on assumptions that are not universally accepted.

Ukitake Jyuushirou
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I took a course subject in basic statistics but its been so long ago I find that I have mixed up or forgotten some of the concepts so I hope someone here can help me refresh my memory.

1) Probability starts from 0 to 1, you can have any range of numbers but they cannot exceed 1 or be less than 0 (true/false)

2) If you have a probability of greater than 0, regardless how small that probability is it will occur given enough time (say infinite amount of time)

3) I was intrigued by a poster with a list of "facts" that supports creationism, it mention someone about Borel and his law and something about infinite monkeys. I did my google but I am still not a 100% sure of what I am reading so I am simplifying my statements here

a) Borel law simply states that if you have a small probability, the probability of it occurring is almost negligible
b) If you have a monkey typing for infinity, then the chance of the monkey typing out Hamlet is almost certain

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ukitake Jyuushirou said:
Hi all

I took a course subject in basic statistics but its been so long ago I find that I have mixed up or forgotten some of the concepts so I hope someone here can help me refresh my memory.

1) Probability starts from 0 to 1, you can have any range of numbers but they cannot exceed 1 or be less than 0 (true/false)
I'm not sure what you mean by "any range of numbers" but, yes, a "probability" cannot be less than 0 nor larger than 1.

2) If you have a probability of greater than 0, regardless how small that probability is it will occur given enough time (say infinite amount of time)
No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability.

3) I was intrigued by a poster with a list of "facts" that supports creationism, it mention someone about Borel and his law and something about infinite monkeys. I did my google but I am still not a 100% sure of what I am reading so I am simplifying my statements here

a) Borel law simply states that if you have a small probability, the probability of it occurring is almost negligible
Actually, "Borel's Law" does not say that- that's just directly from the definition of probability. "Borel's Law" (not really a law in the mathematical sense, just a "rule of thumb") says that you can find a "cut off" so that events with probability less than that cut off number can't reallistically happen under whatever conditons you have set (length of time you are letting the "experiment" run, etc.). Of course, that "cut off" will depend upon the additional conditions you have set.

b) If you have a monkey typing for infinity, then the chance of the monkey typing out Hamlet is almost certain
Theoretically yes. But other than "theoretically" the situaltion is meaningless.

Thanks!

Probably one of the websites you looked at was this:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html
which points out that the "creationist" argument based on "Borel's Law" tend to ignore the non-random determinants in evolution- exactly the things that Darwin's argument was based on. Creationists typically see no intermediate position between "determined by God" and "completely random".
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not sure what you mean by "any range of numbers" but, yes, a "probability" cannot be less than 0 nor larger than 1.
I meant any range of numbers between 0 and 1

HallsofIvy said:
No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability.
so if say the probability of a chimpanzee typing out the whole script of Hamlet is 0.000000000000000000000001 (you get the idea) but if the chimp has infinity time to do it, it WILL NEVER occur?





HallsofIvy said:
Probably one of the websites you looked at was this:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html
which points out that the "creationist" argument based on "Borel's Law" tend to ignore the non-random determinants in evolution- exactly the things that Darwin's argument was based on. Creationists typically see no intermediate position between "determined by God" and "completely random".
What do you mean by non random determinants?

Thanks for your help, much appreciated!
 
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy
No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability.

Ukitake Jyuushirou said:
so if say the probability of a chimpanzee typing out the whole script of Hamlet is 0.000000000000000000000001 (you get the idea) but if the chimp has infinity time to do it, it WILL NEVER occur?

No, I didn't say anything like that! Are you thinking that the only possibllities are "must happen" and "will never happen"? "Probable" and "possible" are quite different things. Given each letter equally likely, it is possible that, in an infinite string of letters you get "aaaaaa...", all a's. On the other hand, it is also possible that the letter "a" will never occur. Neither one "must" happen.




What do you mean by non random determinants?

Thanks for your help, much appreciated!
I mean, of course, natural selection which will weed out fatal mutations.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, I didn't say anything like that! Are you thinking that the only possibllities are "must happen" and "will never happen"? "Probable" and "possible" are quite different things. Given each letter equally likely, it is possible that, in an infinite string of letters you get "aaaaaa...", all a's. On the other hand, it is also possible that the letter "a" will never occur. Neither one "must" happen.

In statistical terms, how would u define probable and possible?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
905
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K