Steam system pipe sizing inquiry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the complexities of pipe sizing in steam systems, particularly when integrating a pressure reducing valve (PRV). The correct approach involves sizing from the furthest point of consumption towards the boiler, while also addressing the unique challenges posed by the PRV. It is essential to treat the upstream and downstream sections of the system as separate problems, ensuring that calculations account for the common steam flow rate but remain independent of each other. Additionally, the sizing of pipes downstream of the PRV is typically larger than those upstream, necessitating careful consideration of the valve's response type.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam system design principles
  • Knowledge of pressure reducing valves (PRVs) and their functions
  • Familiarity with pipe sizing calculations based on velocity and pressure drop
  • Experience with steam flow rate calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of pressure reducing valves on steam system design
  • Learn about pipe sizing methodologies for steam systems
  • Explore software tools for iterative pipe sizing calculations
  • Study the differences between linear and equal percentage response types for valves
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and designers involved in steam system design, HVAC professionals, and anyone responsible for optimizing steam flow and pressure management in industrial applications.

mandoto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good day,

My question relates to the use of a pressure reducing station (pressure reducing valve) in a steam system. As those involved in the design know, pipe sizing is carried out starting with the furthest point (the most demanding point of consumption) and sizing shall start from that point on till we reach the boiler following the different standrads guide lines based on velocity or pressure drop. In case there was no pressure reducing valve(s) fitted on the line we can continue our sizing procedure without any troubles. The problem I face is when there is a pressure reducing station, in this case shall I start sizing in a reveresed mannar starting from the nearest point where pressure and pipe size is known (given that we have started with the most demanding point which typically shall not need any kind of pressure reduction and that line extending from the most demanding point is sized) then carry on till we reach the pressure reducing valve, and then starting our sizing procedure after the pressure reducing valve with the new pressure value approched via the pressure reducer. Also I noted that any pipes downstream the pressure reducing stations are larger than those pipes upstream (feeding) the pressure reducing station.

I'd appreciate it if anyone got a clue if what I've said makes sense? any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are asking about a calculation strategy. Presumably, no matter where in the line you start, or which direction you go, there is only one correct result. A software program may iterate moving up the line then down the line, over and over.

So sorry, I can't guess which strategy works best for you.
 
You are on the right track. A problem such as this is really two separate problems, one downstream of the PRV, the other upstream. You solve each problem by itself without consideration of the other problem. You do have a common steam flow rate, but everything else is independent.

The PRV is a third sizing problem. Be sure to calculate if the valve needs a linear or equal percentage response.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K