Step on design gearbox for speed reducer

  • Thread starter Thread starter superpaul91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on designing a gearbox for a speed reducer, specifically comparing different types of spur gears: Brass, Steel, Stainless Steel, and Ground Spur Gears. The user is considering a steady-state input speed of 1000 RPM and an output speed of 180 RPM, leading to gear ratios of 2:1 and 25/9:1. Key factors influencing the choice of gear ratio include loading, duty cycle, durability, and the overall package size, with a target lifespan of 5 years and a maximum failure rate of 5%. The KHK 3011 catalog is referenced for selecting appropriate spur gears.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gear ratios and their implications in mechanical design
  • Familiarity with materials used in gear manufacturing (Brass, Steel, Stainless Steel, Ground)
  • Knowledge of gearbox design principles and performance metrics
  • Access to the KHK 3011 catalog for gear specifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanical properties and cost-effectiveness of Brass vs. Steel vs. Stainless Steel spur gears
  • Learn about gearbox design calculations, focusing on load, duty cycle, and durability requirements
  • Explore the implications of different gear ratios on performance and efficiency in speed reducers
  • Review the KHK 3011 catalog for specific spur gear options that meet design criteria
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, gearbox designers, and anyone involved in the design and optimization of speed reducers will benefit from this discussion.

superpaul91
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Anyone can guide me how to design gearbox on speed reducer?

If I using spur gear on my design which type of spur gear has better lifetime and lower cost?
1) Brass Spur Gears
2) Steel Spur Gears
3) Stainless Steel Spur Gears
4) Ground Spur Gears

If Steady-state input speed 1000 rpm and Steady-state output speed 180 rpm so
1000/180 = 50/9 by factor this ratio I get 2:1 and 25/9:1

For my N2/N1 is better use ratio 2:1 or 25/9:1 ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm afraid in it's current form there isn't really a question to answer properly. As the answer is 'it depends'.
You've also included three materials and one manufacturing method.

What's the loading, the duty cycle, the required durability? How many sets do you need? Are there any standard you have to design to?

I'm not quite sure what you've done with the second part of the question either, as you are either doing a two stage reduction, so you need both ratios. Or you aren't getting the ratio you require.
 
xxChrisxx said:
I'm afraid in it's current form there isn't really a question to answer properly. As the answer is 'it depends'.
You've also included three materials and one manufacturing method.

What's the loading, the duty cycle, the required durability? How many sets do you need? Are there any standard you have to design to?

I'm not quite sure what you've done with the second part of the question either, as you are either doing a two stage reduction, so you need both ratios. Or you aren't getting the ratio you require.

Sorry for my poor english,
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=51083&stc=1&d=1348285245 (https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=51083&stc=1&d=1348285245)
The expected life of the unit is 5 years, which is based on 8 hours per day and 5 days a week. A maximum of 5% failures are allowed over the design life of the unit. Minimise on the overall package size.I read through KHK 3011 catalog (http://www.khkgears.co.jp/en/catalogs/pdf/3011en.pdf) I found that there are many type of spur gear and module so I want to know which type of spur gear can fulfil the need of client and have smallest overall package size.

Then i try out 1st step which finding the gear size, in my case i using ratio 2:1 for my N2/N1 but some of my friend using 25/9:1 for N2/N1 so i confuse about which ratio I going to choose for my N2/N1 ratio?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
11K