A Stephen Weinberg on Understanding Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
Stephen Weinberg critiques the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, arguing that it inadequately treats observers and measurement processes as classical, rather than quantum. He emphasizes that while quantum mechanics is fundamentally deterministic, it also incorporates probabilistic elements, creating a complex interplay that remains unresolved. Recent advancements in understanding quantum mechanics have not fully addressed the foundational issues, particularly regarding the Born rule and the nature of measurement outcomes. The discussion highlights differing perspectives on interpretations of quantum mechanics, with some favoring a mathematical approach over philosophical considerations. Ultimately, the conversation reflects ongoing debates about the nature of reality as described by quantum mechanics and the validity of various interpretations.
  • #151
Ah, I see. However, the path-integral formalism is also no new theory or even interpretation. It's QT (including both non-relativistic "1st quantization" and relativistic QFT) but offers alternative analytical methodology to evaluate things. It's for sure, together with the invention of Feynman diagrams, among Feynman's most significant contributions to the methodology of theoretical physics.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
vanhees71 said:
Ah, I see. However, the path-integral formalism is also no new theory or even interpretation.

The formalism isn't an interpretation - just the math expressed a different way.

However when people say its taking all possible paths at once it is an interpretation - the path is a hidden variable. Its very novel because the idea of actually taking every possible path at once is, how to put it it, rather unusual.

That said I am not terribly fussed about it - its just semantics which isn't really that important - its the math that is.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #153
What you indeed do in the path integral is to evaluate probability amplitudes in a specific way, i.e., by integrating over all possible trajectories in phase space, leading to the propagator.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba