Stern-Gerlach Experiment (spatial consistency of the magnetic moment)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Stern-Gerlach experiment demonstrates the quantization of angular momentum through the deflection of particles in an inhomogeneous magnetic field aligned along the z-axis. The two distinct deflections arise from the magnetic moments described by the equation \(\mu = \gamma S\). The spin state collapses upon detection, and while spin precession occurs, it does not affect the measurement outcome, which is inferred from the particle's position on the detection screen. A rigorous treatment of the experiment necessitates the use of the Pauli equation, emphasizing the inadequacy of classical arguments in explaining quantum phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and spinors
  • Knowledge of the Pauli equation and its application
  • Basic concepts of magnetic moments and inhomogeneous magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Pauli equation and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Read chapter 3 of Jared's thesis on the Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • Explore the role of the Schrödinger equation in quantum state evolution
  • Investigate the classical versus quantum interpretations of angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists interested in angular momentum quantization, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of the Stern-Gerlach experiment.

nmbr28albert
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
In the Stern-Gerlach experiment, we have an inhomogeneous magnetic field aligned with the axis labeled z. The two distinct deflections are caused by the force from two distinct magnetic moments \mu = \gamma S. I understand that the spin larmor precesses around the field and that the expectation value for S_z remains constant, but when we collapse the spin by placing a screen to detect to detect the particles, how are we certain that after collapsing the spin state (I think the spin is collapsed before going through the field?) the spin vector cannot change spatially, therefore changing the z component of spin. I suspect my misunderstanding is due to thinking about the "directional" nature of spin the wrong way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spin is only measured at the detector, it is not measured in the magnetic field, and in fact we do not measure the spin directly even at the detector. What we measure is the position of the particle on the screen and from this we infer whether or not the particle is spin up or spin down due to the double-splitting of the incident beam along the axis of the magnetic field. So even if there is spin precession it will not affect the purpose of the experiment. That being said, the heuristic treatment of the Stern-Gerlach experiment usually given in QM books when motivating spin leaves a lot to be desired. It is mostly based on classical arguments and as such basically uses nothing from the QM formalism.

For starters, the classical argument uses the idea that the particle experiences a force ##\vec{F} = -\vec{\nabla}(-\vec{\mu}\cdot\vec{B})## due to the inhomogeneous magnetic field coupling to its magnetic moment. This is fine if we are using Newton's 2nd law but when talking about the double-splitting of the incident beam due to the inhomogeneous magnetic field, one must use the Schrödinger equation (or rather an augmentation therefore, see below). Then it is not even clear how one would interpret the double-splitting due to the time evolution of the state ##|\psi \rangle## of each particle under ##i\hbar \partial_t |\psi \rangle = H |\psi \rangle## in terms of a classical force ##F = \mu_z \partial_z B_z##.

A proper treatment of the Stern-Gerlach experiment in fact requires the Pauli equation. So the ##|\psi \rangle## above is in fact a 2-component spinor and ##H## is the Hamiltonian on the space of such spinors. Seeing the Stern-Gerlach effect calculated using the Pauli equation will make it clear to you what role, or rather lack thereof, the spin precession of ##|\psi \rangle## under the spinor time evolution ##i\hbar \partial_t |\psi \rangle = - (\mu \cdot B) |\psi \rangle## plays in the effect.

For this I suggest reading chapter 3 of https://www.physics.byu.edu/research/theory/Docs/JaredsThesis05.pdf.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K