Stochastic Processes: Maximising profits $$

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in stochastic processes related to maximizing profits for a company that incurs manufacturing costs and sells products at a retail price. The customer demand is modeled as a discrete random variable, and participants are exploring how to determine the optimal production quantity to maximize expected profit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up a profit function and calculating the expectation value of profit. There are attempts to differentiate the profit function with respect to production quantity, but some express uncertainty about the next steps. Questions arise regarding the expected value of demand and how to incorporate the probabilities of demand into the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the expected value of sales and how to approach the problem of maximizing expected profit. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between production quantity and demand, with various interpretations being discussed. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive directions have been suggested.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the production quantity is a discrete variable and that the demand is also discrete, which complicates the differentiation approach. There is an emphasis on the uncertainty inherent in demand and the need to make decisions based on expected values rather than exact outcomes.

sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A company incurs manufacturing costs of $q per item. The product is sold at a retail price of $p per item with p > q. The customer demand K (e.g. number of items that will be sold when the number of items offered is large enough) is a discrete random variable in N. The probabilities P[K = k] = pk for all k in N is known through empirical analysis. How many items should the company produce to maximize the expectation value of its profit?


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So i started with setting up a profit function G = pK - qx, where x is the number of items to be produced.
I then take the expectation value of the profit = E(G) = E(pK - qx) = pE(K) - qE(x) now what? I wanted to differentiate w.r.t. x but this won't help here.

I also don't see where I can substitute pk in: E(K) = Sum(E(k)pk) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunrah said:

Homework Statement


A company incurs manufacturing costs of $q per item. The product is sold at a retail price of $p per item with p > q. The customer demand K (e.g. number of items that will be sold when the number of items offered is large enough) is a discrete random variable in N. The probabilities P[K = k] = pk for all k in N is known through empirical analysis. How many items should the company produce to maximize the expectation value of its profit?


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So i started with setting up a profit function G = pK - qx, where x is the number of items to be produced.
I then take the expectation value of the profit = E(G) = E(pK - qx) = pE(K) - qE(x) now what? I wanted to differentiate w.r.t. x but this won't help here.

I also don't see where I can substitute pk in: E(K) = Sum(E(k)pk) ??

If K is the demand, the number of units sold is S = min(K,Q), where Q is the number produced; that is: if Q > K we sell all K units (and are left with Q-K units unsold), but if Q < K we sell Q (i.e., we sell everything we have available). You need to work out the expected value of S.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
You need to work out the expected value of S.

yes, but how? I honestly have no idea.
 
x is not a random variable, E[x] = x.

As was pointed out in post #2, your G is not as it is given in your op:
<br /> G(K, x) = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl}<br /> (p - q) x &amp;, x &lt; K \\<br /> <br /> p K - q x &amp;, x \ge K<br /> \end{array} \right.<br />
 
Last edited:
ok thanks, so differentiating E[G(K,x)]

<br /> \frac{dE[G(K,x)]}{dx} = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl}<br /> (p - q) &amp;, x &lt; K \\<br /> <br /> - q &amp;, x \ge K<br /> \end{array} \right.<br />

so E[G(K,x)] is maximised when

<br /> q = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl}<br /> p &amp;, x &lt; K \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp;, x \ge K<br /> \end{array} \right.<br />
 
Last edited:
sunrah said:
yes, but how? I honestly have no idea.

Start by writing down the formula for the expected profit for given production quantity Q, then see if you can simplify it down to a usable form, say F(Q). To figure out the expected profit maximizing Q, the typical approach in these discrete problems is to look at F(Q+1) - F(Q), and try to find where it switches sign, because that tells you when the graph of y = F(Q) turns over. But first, you need F(Q).

RGV
 
Last edited:
sunrah said:
ok thanks, so differentiating E[G(K,x)]

<br /> \frac{dE[G(K,x)]}{dx} = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl}<br /> (p - q) &amp;, x &lt; K \\<br /> <br /> - q &amp;, x \ge K<br /> \end{array} \right.<br />

so E[G(K,x)] is maximised when

<br /> q = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl}<br /> p &amp;, x &lt; K (seems\ like\ this\ would\ minimise\ it\ to\ me) \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp;, x \ge K<br /> \end{array} \right.<br />

You can't do this. Of course, if you employed a perfect fortune-teller who could tell you exactly what the future demand K will be (before you produce anything) then you would produce exactly that value of x= K. However, that is not what happens. In reality, you first produce the x units then learn afterwards what K is. So, maybe you produced too much, or maybe you did not produce enough. You won't know until after all the money has been spent on production. You cannot avoid making an imperfect decision, but you can try to "win" in the long run, by maximizing the *expected* profit.

BTW, in problems like this, with discrete demand (= 0,1,2,3,...) the production quantity x will also be discrete, so generally you are not able to take the derivative dEG(x,K)/dx, but instead must work with a finite-difference EG(x+1,K) - EG(x,K).

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K