Storing an Image with a Single Photon: Quantum Mechanics at Work

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of storing an image using a single photon, as presented in a scientific article. Participants explore the implications of quantum mechanics in this context, particularly how information is encoded and retrieved from a single photon and the role of wave-particle duality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights that the process of storing an image with a single photon exemplifies the peculiar principles of quantum mechanics, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Another participant questions how information is extracted from the single photon, suggesting the possibility of using a gain medium.
  • A different participant counters the gain medium suggestion, asserting that it cannot write information but only amplify it, indicating a misunderstanding of the retrieval process.
  • One participant clarifies that the image is not retrieved from a single photon but rather from many photons collected by a scanning single photon detector, emphasizing the role of wave-function information.
  • It is noted that a separate high-intensity beam experiment demonstrates visible interference, supporting the claim that image information is retained in the wave-function of the photon.
  • Another point raised is the ability to slow down the propagation of the photon while retaining phase and amplitude information, specifically mentioning a speed of 1/300th of the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of information retrieval from the single photon and the role of gain media, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the exact processes involved in the image retrieval and the implications of using a gain medium, as well as the specifics of the experiments referenced.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,469
Reaction score
8,727
These guys are storing whole images using a single photon!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070119094254.htm

I didn't think too much of the article until I read how they're doing it. It is pretty much living, breathing proof of QM's basic, weirdest principle.

"To produce the UR image, Howell simply shone a beam of light through a stencil with the U and R etched out. Anyone who has made shadow puppets knows how this works, but Howell turned down the light so much that a single photon was all that passed through the stencil.

Quantum mechanics dictates some strange things at that scale, so that bit of light could be thought of as both a particle and a wave. As a wave, it passed through all parts of the stencil at once, carrying the "shadow" of the UR with it. "
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do they get so much info back out? Do they pass the single photon through a gain medium afterwards?
 
That wouldn't make sense, since a gain medium can only amplify information, I don't think it can actually write info in...

Anyway, even though I read about the double slit experiment, I don't fully understand it, so I'll leave this to the experts :)
 
cesiumfrog said:
How do they get so much info back out? Do they pass the single photon through a gain medium afterwards?
The image is not retrieved from a single photon. The picture is made up of
many photons gathered by a scanning single photon detector.

The proof that the image information was available in the wave-function of
the photon comes from a separate high intensity beam experiment which
shows clearly visible interference.

The point they make is that they can slow down the propagation to 1/300th
of the speed of light while retaining both phase and amplitude information.
Here is a description of the experiment on the web page of the authors:http://www.science.rochester.edu/depts/physics/archives/physics_012207.html Regards, Hans
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
873
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
542
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K