Understanding 2x2 Matrices: Representation and Dot Product

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh Conneely
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Strange
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies how a 2x2 matrix X can be represented using a combination of a scalar and a dot product involving Pauli matrices. It explains that the notation X = a0 + sigma . a actually denotes X as a linear combination of the identity matrix and the Pauli matrices, where a0 is a scalar and sigma represents the Pauli matrices. This formulation results in a valid 2x2 matrix. The key takeaway is that the expression combines scalars and matrices in a way that adheres to matrix algebra principles. Understanding this representation is essential for working with quantum mechanics and related fields.
Josh Conneely
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a 2x2 matrix X (not necessarily hermitian, nor unitary) is written as

X = a0 + sigma . a (the sigma . a is a dot product between sigma and a)

where a0 and a1, a2 and a3 are numbers.

How on Earth does X represent a matrix? it's a number added to another number (dot product).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Josh Conneely said:

Homework Statement


Suppose a 2x2 matrix X (not necessarily hermitian, nor unitary) is written as

X = a0 + sigma . a (the sigma . a is a dot product between sigma and a)

where a0 and a1, a2 and a3 are numbers.

How on Earth does X represent a matrix? it's a number added to another number (dot product).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I suspect this is a question about Pauli matrices. That notation is shorthand for X=a0*I+sigma1*a1+sigma2*a2+sigma3*a3 where I is the 2x2 identity matrices and sigma1, sigma2 and sigma3 are 2x2 matrices collectively referred to as sigma. The result X is a 2x2 matrix.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K