Strange questions about language/energy

  • Medical
  • Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Strange
In summary, I think that hand gestures might require less energy than talking, which could be why we don't regularly use them.
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,923
261
Sometime when I'm tired, I'd rather make hand gestures (like an instinct in me) than opening my mouth and pronouncing sounds/intelligible words. I wonder which of the 2 requires more energy to our body.
As I read that swinging our arms when walking costs us 10% energy less than non swinging them, I also wonder why, in the case that moving hands/fingers costs us less than talking, we didn't develop such a skill.
A bit off topic: maybe obese people should try not to swing their arms when walking?

Edit: Have you experienced the same feeling, i.e. wanting to make gestures instead of talking? I do experience it several times a week. I don't know why, but I'm very tired although I sleep about 8 hours a day and in a somewhat good bed.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do you know sign language? Did your parents teach you signs when you were an infant?
 
  • #3
lisab said:
Do you know sign language? Did your parents teach you signs when you were an infant?

I know about it but I don't know it. I never been taught it.
 
  • #4
fluidistic said:
As I read that swinging our arms when walking costs us 10% energy less than non swinging them, I also wonder why, in the case that moving hands/fingers costs us less than talking, we didn't develop such a skill.
A bit off topic: maybe obese people should try not to swing their arms when walking?

I assume when you said "obese people" what you really meant to say was "people wishing to exercise and get/keep in shape"? The two groups overlap but they are by no means synonymous. Hmm?

Something I heard recently is that you can get more exercise out of a walk by - not merely stopping swinging, but swinging your arms in the opposite phase than what is natural. i.e. put left arm forward with left foot forward. Apparently this can nearly double the calories burned.
 
  • #5
DaveC426913 said:
I assume when you said "obese people" what you really meant to say was "people wishing to exercise and get/keep in shape"? The two groups overlap but they are by no means synonymous. Hmm?
I meant overweighted people. If they are not willing to change their habits (of not doing exercise) and/or if they don't have time to exercise, they could at least try not to swing their arms.
DaveC426913 said:
Something I heard recently is that you can get more exercise out of a walk by - not merely stopping swinging, but swinging your arms in the opposite phase than what is natural. i.e. put left arm forward with left foot forward. Apparently this can nearly double the calories burned.

This is awesome, I just tried it, it's so funny!
 
  • #6
fluidistic said:
I meant overweighted people. If they are not willing to change their habits (of not doing exercise) and/or if they don't have time to exercise, they could at least try not to swing their arms.
OK well, I gave you a chance...

What you have said is ignorant and prejudiced. You have no business generalizing about overweight people.

The people you should be talking about is people who wish to exercise and get a little more out of their walk.
 
  • #7
DaveC426913 said:
OK well, I gave you a chance...

What you have said is ignorant and prejudiced. You have no business generalizing about overweight people.

The people you should be talking about is people who wish to exercise and get a little more out of their walk.

Ok. I don't mean to offence anyone. Notice the "and/or" part.
I think that if one needs to do some exercise but for some reason (unwillingness, impossibilities due to time constraints) cannot do it, at least he could change its way of walking, if possible of course. That's an idea. I think that most people aren't aware they can "burn" calories this way.
Sorry if I offended you or anyone. It's not my goal.

My goal is to get answers from my bold questions in the first post and to know whether people have experienced the same feeling or not.
 
  • #8
I often make gestures and move my hands around when I talk to people. Usually its because I have some picture in my mind dealing with what I'm talking about and I'm trying to convey that information to the person I'm communicating with. Sometimes hand gesturing helps me to remember the correct words to express my ideas.
 
  • #9
fluidistic said:
Sometime when I'm tired, I'd rather make hand gestures (like an instinct in me) than opening my mouth and pronouncing sounds/intelligible words. I wonder which of the 2 requires more energy to our body.
Are you thinking hand gestures might require less energy, which is why you resort to them when tired?

I think, for you, the hand gestures might well represent less mental effort, which is probably a different animal than less energy.
 
  • #10
zoobyshoe said:
Are you thinking hand gestures might require less energy, which is why you resort to them when tired?
Yes.
zoobyshoe said:
I think, for you, the hand gestures might well represent less mental effort, which is probably a different animal than less energy.
Interesting. In fact it occurred to me but I discarded it. It's true that when you're tired you don't feel like forming long sentences. You'd rather just answer by "yes", "no", etc. Turning the thumb up and down doesn't seem very hard compared to pronounce sounds.
But I'm curious, why when we're tired we would avoid to use "mental energy" instead of just physical energy? Although I know the brain uses quite a lot of energy, I don't think that thinking a sentence requires more energy than say, lefting up an arm.
It does not totally convinces me that I'd use less mental energy since I feel I could start a conversation with gestures (yeah I do think long sentences, but I'm so tired I won't speak), even if I have to form long sentences. But it pisses my girlfriend (I live with her) so much that I don't have the opportunity.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
Something I heard recently is that you can get more exercise out of a walk by - not merely stopping swinging, but swinging your arms in the opposite phase than what is natural. i.e. put left arm forward with left foot forward. Apparently this can nearly double the calories burned.
This doesn't make any sense Dave, can you post a link to the study that measured this?
 
  • #12
Evo said:
This doesn't make any sense Dave, can you post a link to the study that measured this?
Here's a reference to a study:
http://www.physorg.com/news168027773.html
"Holding one's arms as one walks requires 12 percent more metabolic energy, compared with swinging them."

...opposite-to-normal swing forces up the metabolic rate by a quarter.
OK, only 25% then.

buuuut ... if holding arms still raises metabolism by 12%, and swinging opposite raises it by 25%... that's sort of double... :tongue2:



But all you have to do is try it. It's difficult to do, it works many more muscles (because it's not conservative of motion); there's no question that it'll burn more energy.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
Here's a reference to a study:
http://www.physorg.com/news168027773.html

OK, only 25% then.

buuuut ... if holding arms still raises metabolism by 12%, and swinging opposite raises it by 25%... that's sort of double... :tongue2:



But all you have to do is try it. It's difficult to do, it works many more muscles (because it's not conservative of motion); there's no question that it'll burn more energy.
Unfortunately that's not a real medical research study, that's a chiropractic clainm with no science to back it up.
 
  • #14
Evo said:
Unfortunately that's not a real medical research study, that's a chiropractic clainm with no science to back it up.

OK.

Are you refuting the numbers, or are you refuting (my) claim that swinging one's arms opposite will burn more calories than the more natural walk?
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
Here's a reference to a study:
http://www.physorg.com/news168027773.html

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/276/1673/3679.long
Proc. R. Soc. B 22 October 2009 vol. 276 no. 1673 3679-3688
Dynamic arm swinging in human walking
Steven H. Collins, Peter G. Adamczyk, Arthur D. Kuo
Humans tend to swing their arms when they walk, a curious behaviour since the arms play no obvious role in bipedal gait. It might be costly to use muscles to swing the arms, and it is unclear whether potential benefits elsewhere in the body would justify such costs. To examine these costs and benefits, we developed a passive dynamic walking model with free-swinging arms. Even with no torques driving the arms or legs, the model produced walking gaits with arm swinging similar to humans. Passive gaits with arm phasing opposite to normal were also found, but these induced a much greater reaction moment from the ground, which could require muscular effort in humans. We therefore hypothesized that the reduction of this moment may explain the physiological benefit of arm swinging. Experimental measurements of humans (n = 10) showed that normal arm swinging required minimal shoulder torque, while volitionally holding the arms still required 12 per cent more metabolic energy. Among measures of gait mechanics, vertical ground reaction moment was most affected by arm swinging and increased by 63 per cent without it. Walking with opposite-to-normal arm phasing required minimal shoulder effort but magnified the ground reaction moment, causing metabolic rate to increase by 26 per cent. Passive dynamics appear to make arm swinging easy, while indirect benefits from reduced vertical moments make it worthwhile overall.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
fluidistic said:
But I'm curious, why when we're tired we would avoid to use "mental energy" instead of just physical energy? Although I know the brain uses quite a lot of energy, I don't think that thinking a sentence requires more energy than say, lefting up an arm.
I know that part and parcel of falling asleep is that the brain stem sends the message to the thalamus to lower brain activity in the cortex. It makes sense to suppose that physical activity isn't lowered in lockstep with mental activity because we're often tired before we're in a position to actually sleep and need a bit of physical energy and coordination to get to a place we can let go and "crash". So, I think the physical energy you have left to gesture after your language cortex is already on it's way to sleep mode is probably from the same reserve of physical arousal being allowed for you to get up and relocate to your bed.
 
  • #17
MaxwellsDemon said:
I often make gestures and move my hands around when I talk to people. Usually its because I have some picture in my mind dealing with what I'm talking about and I'm trying to convey that information to the person I'm communicating with. Sometimes hand gesturing helps me to remember the correct words to express my ideas.
This is a bit off topic, but I love the subject of hand gestures accompanying speech. I am especially entertained by girls who spontaneously pepper their speech with cute and clever illustrative hand gestures in support of, and sometimes in place of, words.
 

1. What is the relationship between language and energy?

The relationship between language and energy is complex and multi-faceted. On one hand, language is a powerful tool for communicating about energy and understanding its various forms and functions. On the other hand, language itself is a form of energy, as it requires energy from our brains and vocal cords to produce and comprehend.

2. Can language be used to harness or manipulate energy?

While language alone cannot physically harness or manipulate energy, it can be used to influence people's thoughts and behaviors, which can in turn affect the use and distribution of energy in society. For example, persuasive language can shape public opinion and influence government policies on energy production and consumption.

3. Are there any languages that have a special connection to energy?

There is no evidence to suggest that any particular language has a special connection to energy. However, different languages may have unique ways of describing and conceptualizing energy based on their cultural and historical contexts. For example, some indigenous languages have words that describe specific types of energy in nature, such as wind or sunlight.

4. How does the use of language impact our perception of energy?

Language plays a crucial role in shaping our perceptions of energy. The words we use to describe energy can influence how we think about it, whether it's seen as a scarce resource or an abundant force. Additionally, the language used in media and advertising can also shape public perceptions and attitudes towards different forms of energy and their impact on the environment.

5. Can language affect the flow or transfer of energy?

Language itself does not have the power to affect the flow or transfer of energy. However, the way language is used in communication and decision-making processes can influence the use and distribution of energy. For example, clear and effective communication can help streamline energy distribution processes, while miscommunication or language barriers can lead to inefficiencies or errors.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
9
Replies
287
Views
19K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
420
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
631
Replies
9
Views
921
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
28
Views
1K
Back
Top