Stress Energy Tensor for Oscillator: Setup for Electron in E-Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of setting up the stress-energy tensor (SET) for an electron oscillating in an electric field with frequency ω. It is established that a point particle does not possess a traditional SET, which describes a continuous distribution of matter/energy. The conversation highlights the necessity of incorporating the stress-energy of the field and constructing a charge-current 4-vector to maintain self-consistency while solving Maxwell's Equations. The participants emphasize the complexity of this problem, noting that it is not typically addressed in standard relativity textbooks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's Equations
  • Knowledge of stress-energy tensor concepts
  • Basic understanding of charge-current 4-vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the stress-energy tensor for a perfect fluid
  • Study the application of delta functions in physics
  • Explore the relationship between charge-current 4-vectors and electromagnetic fields
  • Examine advanced topics in General Relativity using sources like Misner's textbook
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced topics in General Relativity and electromagnetic theory.

Devin
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
How would one go about setting up the stress energy tensor for a particle, say an electron subjected to electric an electric field that makes the particle oscillate with frequency \omega?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Devin said:
How would one go about setting up the stress energy tensor for a particle

Strictly speaking, a point particle doesn't have a stress-energy tensor. The SET describes a continuous distribution of matter/energy. However, you can finesse this by using delta functions, as shown here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress–energy_tensor#Stress.E2.80.93energy_in_special_situations

However, as that article says, the SET given there is for a non-interacting particle. I don't think you can consistently formulate an SET for just a charged particle in an electric field. You would have to include the stress-energy in the field as well, and to be self-consistent you would have to also construct a charge-current 4-vector to describe the particle and solve Maxwell's Equations, and verify that your solution of Maxwell's Equations gave you the fields you used to construct the SET.

It would help to have more information about why you want to do this.
 
I'm just in my beginning stages of learning the theory. I've derived just about everything, but i don't understand the stress tensor, or how to construct it. I would like to be able to solve problems, and this is one that came to mind.
 
Devin said:
I'm just in my beginning stages of learning the theory.

What theory? SR? GR? What sources have you used? How did this particular problem occur to you?

I'm asking because the problem you're asking about is not one that is normally encountered as an exercise in relativity textbooks; they usually ask about stress-energy tensors that are much easier to define and work with, such as the SET of a perfect fluid.
 
GR is what I'm working out of. Misner, Lewis, and plenty of YouTube lectures. It was simply a construct that I had imagined...

PeterDonis said:
What theory? SR? GR? What sources have you used? How did this particular problem occur to you?

I'm asking because the problem you're asking about is not one that is normally encountered as an exercise in relativity textbooks; they usually ask about stress-energy tensors that are much easier to define and work with, such as the SET of a perfect fluid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K