Einstein Field Eqs: Stress Energy Tensor Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) and the Stress-Energy Tensor (SET) in the context of General Relativity (GR), specifically regarding a spherical, non-moving, non-spinning neutron star. It is established that for such a star, the spatial components of the SET, ##T^{0i}##, are zero due to the lack of momentum transfer. The temporal component, ##T^{00}##, represents energy density, specifically mass-energy and kinetic energy, and does not include gravitational potential energy. Outside the star, where the energy density ##\rho = 0##, ##T^{00}## is also zero, confirming that gravitational potential energy is not a necessary consideration for predictions in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations (EFE)
  • Familiarity with Stress-Energy Tensor (SET) concepts
  • Basic knowledge of General Relativity (GR)
  • Concept of geodesics in curved spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Stress-Energy Tensor in various spacetimes
  • Explore the concept of gravitational potential energy in General Relativity
  • Learn about the role of mass-energy equivalence in GR
  • Investigate the behavior of particles on geodesics in curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity, astrophysicists studying neutron stars, and anyone interested in the mathematical formulation of the Stress-Energy Tensor.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I have just started the Einstein field equations in my readings on GR and I want to make sure I understand the stress energy tensor. If we have a spherical, non-moving, non-spinning source, let's say a neutron star (I don't know much about neutron stars, so I apologize if the non-moving and spinning are realistic). Please tell me if the following are correct. As nothing moves, ##T^{0i} = 0##. ##T^{ij}##, should be equal to the pressure inside the star (as particles don't move across boundaries to carry momentum). Now for ##T^{00}##, this contains ##\rho## the energy density. Now here is where I am a bit confused, does ##T^{00}## also contains the gravitational potential energy at a given point, or the potential energy doesn't exist in GR (i.e. mass curves spacetime and particles move on geodesics there, without needing the notion of potential energy). So let's say just outside the star, where ##\rho = 0## the ##T^{00}## is 0 or is the potential energy created by the star at that point? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
does ##T^{00}## also contains the gravitational potential energy at a given point, or the potential energy doesn't exist in GR (i.e. mass curves spacetime and particles move on geodesics there, without needing the notion of potential energy). So let's say just outside the star, where ##\rho = 0## the ##T^{00}## is 0 or is the potential energy created by the star at that point? Thank you!
You are correct that it does not contain gravitational potential energy, and it is zero outside the star. The energy focused on for most problems in GR is mass-energy and kinetic energy, which merge into one under the GR framework.
 
Silviu said:
does ##T^{00}## also contains the gravitational potential energy at a given point

No.

Silviu said:
or the potential energy doesn't exist in GR

There is a valid concept of gravitational potential energy in GR. It only applies to a certain class of spacetimes, but the one you are considering is in this class.

Silviu said:
(i.e. mass curves spacetime and particles move on geodesics there, without needing the notion of potential energy)

This is correct; although there is a valid concept of gravitational potential energy in GR that applies to certain spacetimes (including the one you are considering), you don't need to use it to make any predictions about spacetime curvature and particle motions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
774
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K