Undergrad String theory and Lorentz invariance - 10D vs. 4D....

Click For Summary
String theory is considered manifestly Lorentz invariant, but there is confusion regarding whether this applies in 4D spacetime or the full 10D context. Some sources suggest that achieving 4D Lorentz invariance may break Lorentz invariance in the higher dimensions, raising concerns about the implications for the theory. The discussion also explores the potential effects of probing compactified dimensions with high-energy particles, like protons, and what observable phenomena might indicate the existence of these extra dimensions. There is a curiosity about whether a proton accelerated to sufficient momentum would exhibit changes in behavior when interacting with the curled-up dimensions. Overall, the relationship between Lorentz invariance in different dimensional contexts remains a complex and intriguing topic.
asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
Hi all,

Clarification question: I've read that string theory is manifestly Lorentz invariant - however, I'm confused about this being true in 4D spacetime or in the full 10D setting of the theory (well, one version anyway). At some point I'd also read in a paper that 4D Lorentz invariance necessarily breaks Lorentz invariance in 10D ... however, I've misplaced the reference, unfortunately.

If Lorentz invariance in 10D is not satisfied, doesn't this have serious implications? (even if those dimensions are compactified) Or from a GR perspective, does one only care about the 4 extended spacetime dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And a follow up: if we were somehow able to achieve the required energies to probe the curled up dimensions with a test particle (say a proton), what would one expect to observe, to actually verify the existence of the extra dimensions (I've been unable to find info on this).

Thanks.
 
Perhaps there's a better way I could ask the question? If in the compactified 6 dimensions, Lorentz invariance is not satisfied, what effects would this have? I'd appreciate any input.
 
Thanks @fresh_42. Going to back my second question:
asimov42 said:
And a follow up: if we were somehow able to achieve the required energies to probe the curled up dimensions with a test particle (say a proton), what would one expect to observe, to actually verify the existence of the extra dimensions (I've been unable to find info on this).

So we accelerate the proton to the point where it acquires sufficient momentum to 'move' in the curled up space - what do we observe (in our particle accelerator)? Simply a massive particle that stops moving in 3D? (because a momentum change to the 6 curled up dimensions would be unobservable) ... that is, what would one expect to happen to the proton at the exact point where it gained sufficient momentum?
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K