String Theory: Understanding Superstring Theory and Its Location

  • Thread starter Thread starter redhedkangaro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Superstring
Click For Summary
String theory posits that all particles in the universe are different vibrating states of fundamental strings, rather than point-like objects. These strings are not singular; there are many strings, each representing an elementary particle. The theory incorporates supersymmetry, linking fermions and bosons, and is formally known as Supersymmetric String Theory. Historical discussions suggest that the concept of vibrating strings has roots dating back to pre-atomic models, and it serves as a natural extension of quantum field theory. The development of string theory has evolved alongside challenges in particle physics, particularly in explaining hadrons before the establishment of quantum chromodynamics (QCD).
redhedkangaro
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is called superstring theory since the theory provides supersymmetry (symmetry between fermions and bosons) - i.e. superstring theory is short hand of Supersymmetric String Theory
 
redhedkangaro said:
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
No, string theory says that particles are not really pointlike objects, but objects slightly extended in one dimension. There is no only one string in the universe, but many of them - each elementary particle is actually a little string.
 
Thanks that helps a lot. Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
 
redhedkangaro said:
Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
Are you asking which facts suggested historically the string hypothesis ?

First, the very idea that things are made of vibrating string is fairly old. I think you can easily go back to before we knew even what atoms are. I have vague memories of 19th century models of atoms as knotted objects.

Second, one could argue that it is a natural generalization of quantum field theory of particles. Generally speaking, a particle is a 0 dimensional object. If you have difficulties to construct a consistent theory of 0 dimensional objects, you may want to even try what happens with object of larger dimensions, starting with 1. You would find out that you need to include also other kind of higher dimensional structures, such as branes.

Third, before the advent of QCD there was around the idea that hadrons could be better explained in terms of strings. That was a very promising idea. It met with difficulties around the same time as QCD was understood, but later people realized they could still use it to construct elegant unified models.
 
I thought I would start a thread, as as spinoff to perhaps highlight and contemplate of that the ideas in the paper mitchell porter pointed to means. I just started to sniff it.. and wrote in the other thread "How to fix Relativistic QM so it's consistent?" Indeed fixing relativity and how to understnad equivalences, seems to be the central issue of the below paper. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Huge paper, I havent ready it through fully but skimmed...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K