String Theory, which is stronger, Caltech or Stanford?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between PhD offers from Caltech and Stanford, focusing on string theory and high energy physics. While Stanford has more professors in high energy theory, many specialize in phenomenology, whereas Caltech's faculty emphasizes mathematical aspects of the field. Financial considerations include Stanford's TA+RA position with a salary of $36K compared to Caltech's fellowship of $32K, but the high cost of living in the San Francisco Bay area is a significant factor. Ultimately, the decision hinges on the student's specific research interests and the academic environment that aligns best with them. The choice between these prestigious institutions is complex and requires careful consideration of both academic focus and living expenses.
LiXinghe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I am an international student from China. Currently I received offers of a PhD position from both Caltech and Stanford. I applied for Hep-th and my main interests are formal field theories and string theory.

I know both Caltech and Stanford are great schools in physics. And it seems that Stanford has more professors in high energy theory than Caltech. However when I look more carefully, most of the professors at Stanford focus on phenomenology. And Caltech faculties (like S.Gukov, A.Kapustin) focus more on the mathematical aspects. Then it's hard for me to decide which graduate school to go.

BTW: Stanford offers me TA+RA position with salary 36K. Caltech offers me a fellowship of 32K. But financial reasons aren't important, are they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LiXinghe said:
Stanford offers me TA+RA position with salary 36K. Caltech offers me a fellowship of 32K.

You need to take the cost of living into account. The San Francisco Bay area (Stanford) is notoriously very expensive. The area near Caltech (Pasadena / Los Angeles) is still expensive, but maybe somewhat less so.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
852