Structure of the wave function space F

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
norbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
hello all
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I have some concerns about Structure of the wave function space F I am referring to chapter II of QUANTUM MECHANICS OF Cohen-Tannoudji
The item A-1.a of this chapter say:

It can easily be shown that F satisfies all the criteria of a vector space. As an example, we demostrate that if [tex]\psi[/tex]1(r) and
[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r) [tex]\in[/tex] F. then*

[tex]\psi[/tex](r) = [tex]\lambda[/tex]1[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r) + [tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r) [tex]\in[/tex] F

where [tex]\lambda[/tex]1 and [tex]\lambda[/tex]2 are two arbitrary complex numbers

In order to show that [tex]\psi[/tex](r) is square integrable
expand [tex]\left|[/tex] [tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 :

[tex]\psi[/tex](r)


|[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 = |[tex]\lambda[/tex]1|2|[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)|2 + |[tex]\lambda[/tex]2|2|[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)|2 + [tex]\lambda[/tex]1*[tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]1[tex]^{}*[/tex](r)[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)+[tex]\lambda[/tex]1[tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)[tex]\psi[/tex]2*(r)


|[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 is therefore smaller than a function whose
integral converges, since [tex]\psi[/tex]1
and [tex]\psi[/tex]2 are aquare-integrable
 
Last edited:


On my last comment referred to the space functions F we have the |[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 expanded expression given by (A-3)

The last two terms of (A-3) have the same modulus, which has as an upper limit:

|[tex]\lambda[/tex]1||[tex]\lambda[/tex]2|[|[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)|2 + [tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)|2]

Its OK, tha last two terms have the same modulus.

The question is:
Why the last two terms of (A-3) have the above expression??
What does mean "upper limit"??
What is the relation of this question with "triangular inequality" referred to complex-variable?
see Churchil -----"Analysis of complex-variable"-----

The Author´s comment is not clear for me
Can someone explain me this a little better?

thank you