Structure of the wave function space F

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the structure of the wave function space F as described in chapter II of "Quantum Mechanics" by Cohen-Tannoudji. Participants are examining the properties of this space, particularly focusing on the conditions under which wave functions are square integrable and the implications of certain mathematical expressions related to complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concerns about the criteria for the wave function space F, specifically regarding the square integrability of the wave function derived from two other wave functions.
  • Another participant asks for further clarification on the mathematical expression involving the last two terms of the expanded expression for |\psi(r)|² and their upper limit.
  • Questions are raised about the meaning of "upper limit" in this context and its relation to the triangular inequality in complex variables.
  • A reference to Churchill's "Analysis of complex-variable" is made, indicating a desire for deeper understanding of the mathematical concepts involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to be seeking clarification and further explanation rather than expressing outright agreement or disagreement. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific mathematical interpretations and implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the properties of complex numbers and the definitions of terms like "upper limit" and "triangular inequality." The discussion does not resolve these mathematical steps or definitions.

norbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
hello all
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I have some concerns about Structure of the wave function space F I am referring to chapter II of QUANTUM MECHANICS OF Cohen-Tannoudji
The item A-1.a of this chapter say:

It can easily be shown that F satisfies all the criteria of a vector space. As an example, we demostrate that if [tex]\psi[/tex]1(r) and
[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r) [tex]\in[/tex] F. then*

[tex]\psi[/tex](r) = [tex]\lambda[/tex]1[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r) + [tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r) [tex]\in[/tex] F

where [tex]\lambda[/tex]1 and [tex]\lambda[/tex]2 are two arbitrary complex numbers

In order to show that [tex]\psi[/tex](r) is square integrable
expand [tex]\left|[/tex] [tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 :

[tex]\psi[/tex](r)


|[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 = |[tex]\lambda[/tex]1|2|[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)|2 + |[tex]\lambda[/tex]2|2|[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)|2 + [tex]\lambda[/tex]1*[tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]1[tex]^{}*[/tex](r)[tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)+[tex]\lambda[/tex]1[tex]\lambda[/tex]2[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)[tex]\psi[/tex]2*(r)


|[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 is therefore smaller than a function whose
integral converges, since [tex]\psi[/tex]1
and [tex]\psi[/tex]2 are aquare-integrable
 
Last edited:


Yes, and more?
 


On my last comment referred to the space functions F we have the |[tex]\psi[/tex](r)|2 expanded expression given by (A-3)

The last two terms of (A-3) have the same modulus, which has as an upper limit:

|[tex]\lambda[/tex]1||[tex]\lambda[/tex]2|[|[tex]\psi[/tex]1(r)|2 + [tex]\psi[/tex]2(r)|2]

Its OK, tha last two terms have the same modulus.

The question is:
Why the last two terms of (A-3) have the above expression??
What does mean "upper limit"??
What is the relation of this question with "triangular inequality" referred to complex-variable?
see Churchil -----"Analysis of complex-variable"-----

The Author´s comment is not clear for me
Can someone explain me this a little better?

thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
465