Stuck on Polar Coordinate Components?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle's motion described by the polar equation \( r=2b\sin(\theta) \). Participants explore the conversion of this equation into Cartesian coordinates, the implications of zero transverse acceleration, and the derivation of various components of acceleration in polar coordinates. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to polar and Cartesian coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the trajectory can be expressed in Cartesian coordinates as \( x^2+(y-b)^2=b^2 \), indicating a circular path centered at \( (0,b) \).
  • Others question the validity of the polar equation \( r=2b\sin(\theta) \) for \( \theta \) values in the range \( \pi < \theta < 2\pi \), suggesting that \( r \) should be expressed as \( r=2b|\sin(\theta)| \) to ensure positivity.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in differentiating \( r^2\dot{\theta} \) and finds the process messy, indicating a need for clarification.
  • Another participant provides a hint regarding the angular acceleration equation, leading to the conclusion that \( r^2\dot{\theta} \) is constant.
  • Several participants discuss their calculations for \( \dot{r} \) and \( \ddot{r} \), with some expressing uncertainty about their results and the steps taken.
  • There are multiple mentions of mistakes in calculations, particularly in the derivation of the radial component of acceleration, with participants attempting to correct each other’s work.
  • One participant suggests using the identity \( \sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1 \) to simplify expressions, while others struggle to eliminate terms correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the form of the trajectory as a circle but disagree on the implications of the polar equation for certain ranges of \( \theta \). There is no consensus on the correctness of the derived expressions for acceleration components, as several participants express confusion and uncertainty about their calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations appear to rely on specific assumptions about the values of \( r \) and \( \theta \), and participants note potential mistakes in their differentiation steps. The discussion reflects a range of approaches to the problem, with various interpretations of the equations involved.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in polar coordinates, particle motion, and the conversion between coordinate systems may find this discussion relevant. It may also benefit those looking for collaborative problem-solving approaches in mathematical physics.

Carla1985
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on the second part of this question.

Suppose a particle moves in a plane with its trajectory given by the polar equation $r=2b\sin(\theta)$ for some constant $b>0$.

(i) Show that this can be written in Cartesian coordinates as $x^2+(y-b)^2=b^2$.

This is the equation for a circle of centre $(0,b)$ and radius $b$.

[Hint: recall that $r^2=x^2+y^2$ and $y=r\sin(\theta)$]

(ii) Suppose that the transverse component of the acceleration is zero.

(a) Prove that $r^2\dot{\theta}=h$ is constant.

(b) Assuming that $r\ne0$, show that $\dot{r}=2bhr^{-2}\cos(\theta)$ and hence find $\ddot{r}$.

(c) Use your answers to (b) to show that the radial component of the acceleration is $-8b^2h^2r^{-5}$.

So far, I've got:

$r=2b\sin(\theta)$

$\dot{r}=2b\cos(\theta)\dot{\theta}$

So, the transverse coordinate is $4b\cos(\theta)\dot{\theta}^2+2b\sin(\theta)\dot{ \theta}$.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Carla1985 said:
I'm stuck on the second part of this question.

Suppose a particle moves in a plane with its trajectory given by the polar equation $r=2b\sin(\theta)$ for some constant $b>0$...

Of course it must be r>0 so that i wonder if the equation of the trajectory is, may be, $ r= 2\ b\ |\sin \theta|$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I don't understand, sorry. I'm on part ii) a. I've found a hint in some of our notes to differentiate
r2θ˙

but that just gets really messy and I don't see how it helped :/
 
Welcome to MHB, Carla1985! :)

As you can see here or here, the angular acceleration is $a_\theta = r\ddot\theta + 2 \dot r \dot\theta$.
Is that perchance in your notes?

Since $a_\theta = 0$, it follows that:

$r\ddot\theta + 2 \dot r \dot\theta = 0$​

You already saw in (i) that it is useful to multiply by r:

$r^2\ddot\theta + 2r \dot r \dot\theta = 0$

$\frac{d}{dt}(r^2\dot\theta) = 0$

$r^2\dot\theta = constant$ $\qquad \blacksquare$​
 
Last edited:
Ah that makes sense. Thank you :)
 
chisigma said:
Of course it must be r>0 so that i wonder if the equation of the trajectory is, may be, $ r= 2\ b\ |\sin \theta|$...

When $\pi < \theta < 2\pi$ there is no positive value for r... but with a negative value it still fits the orbit, which is a circle around (0,b) with radius b.
 
Ah yes, I think that's what we proved in part 1, that its trajectory is a circle :)
 
I've made a mistake somewhere in the last 2 parts but can't find where.
r.=2bhr-2cos
r..=-2bhr-2sinθ-8b2h2r-5cos2θ

then for the radial component
(-2bhr-2sinθ-8b2h2r-5cos2θ-2bh2r-4sinθ)

which isn't what I want lol
 
Carla1985 said:
I've made a mistake somewhere in the last 2 parts but can't find where.
r.=2bhr-2cos
r..=-2bhr-2sinθ-8b2h2r-5cos2θ

then for the radial component
(-2bhr-2sinθ-8b2h2r-5cos2θ-2bh2r-4sinθ)

which isn't what I want lol


Your $\dot r$ looks good! (Except for the θ that didn't make it.)

And in your $\ddot r$, it seems that you forgot the $\dot \theta$.
Makes sense because you lost a $\theta$ before that. ;)

I'm assuming you continued with:

$a_r = \ddot r - r \dot \theta^2$​

Did you consider that you can eliminate $\sin \theta$ by using $r = 2b\sin\theta$?
 
  • #10
ILikeSerena said:
Your $\dot r$ looks good! (Except for the θ that didn't make it.)

And in your $\ddot r$, it seems that you forgot the $\dot \theta$.
Makes sense because you lost a $\theta$ before that. ;)

I'm assuming you continued with:
$a_r = \ddot r - r \dot \theta^2$​

Did you consider that you can eliminate $\sin \theta$ by using $r = 2b\sin\theta$?

I substituted $\dot \theta$ with hr-2 from in the last step? And no I didnt think of that but I'l give it a try
 
  • #11
Tried eliminating sinθ and its close but not quite

Im left with -h2r-3 and -h2r-1 so still don't cancel out and I still have a cos2θ in the middle term that shouldn't be there
 
  • #12
Did you know that $\sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1$?
 
  • #13
ILikeSerena said:
Did you know that $\sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1$?

Yes, that's what I thought I was working towards but I have a - between them not a x
 
  • #14
Carla1985 said:
Yes, that's what I thought I was working towards but I have a - between them not a x

You can still replace $\cos^2\theta$ by $1 - \sin^2 \theta$.
 
  • #15
Still doesn't work. I get:

sin - (the term i want to be left with) + sin2 -sin
The 3 terms with sin have different coefficients so still don't cancel out
 
  • #16
Sorry, but I'm way overdue to sleep.
See you tomorrow! (Sleepy)
 
  • #17
nps, me too. thanks for all the help, I am sure il get it in the morning after some sleep :)
 
  • #18
Carla1985 said:
nps, me too. thanks for all the help, I am sure il get it in the morning after some sleep :)

Hey Carla1985! ;)

Did you get it by now?
To be honest, I did not.
I haven't properly checked my calculations yet, but I'm not getting the result stated in your problem, just like you.
I can get an expression in just $r$ and $\theta$ which seems to be the purpose of the exercise.
but it's just not what is suggested.
Perhaps they were wrong? Or perhaps I made a mistake. :(
 
  • #19
I made progress. I had the differentiation slightly wrong to start with. So I have:

\[

r=2bsin\theta \\
\dot{r}=2bhr^{-2}cos\theta \\
\ddot{r}=-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\
\\
which\ gives: \\
\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2=-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\
so\ =-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-4bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\

\]

Im not sure how to get rid of the cos onwards, apparently we divide through by something :/
 
  • #20
Carla1985 said:
I made progress. I had the differentiation slightly wrong to start with. So I have:

\[

r=2bsin\theta \\
\dot{r}=2bhr^{-2}cos\theta \\
\ddot{r}=-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\
\\
which\ gives: \\
\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2=-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta-2bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\
so\ =-8b^2h^2r^{-5}cos^2\theta-4bh^2r^{-4}sin\theta \\

\]

Im not sure how to get rid of the cos onwards, apparently we divide through by something :/

Looks good! :)

So let's continue:

$a_r = -8b^2h^2r^{-5}\cos^2\theta-4bh^2r^{-4}\sin\theta$

$a_r = -8b^2h^2r^{-5}(1 - \sin^2\theta)-4bh^2r^{-4}\sin\theta$

$a_r = -8b^2h^2r^{-5} + 8b^2h^2r^{-5}\sin^2\theta-4bh^2r^{-4}\sin\theta$​

We can substitute $r = 2b \sin \theta$ (in reverse), getting:

$a_r = -8b^2h^2r^{-5} + 2h^2r^{-5}\cdot r^2-2h^2r^{-4} \cdot r$

$a_r = -8b^2h^2r^{-5}$ $\qquad \blacksquare$​

There you go! ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K