Studio grade microphones are sensitive to dust

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dust
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sensitivity of studio-grade microphones to dust and the best methods for protecting them when not in use. Participants explore various covering options, including plastic bags and cloth coverings, and their implications for sound quality and moisture management.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that dust accumulation on the diaphragm of microphones can degrade sound quality.
  • One participant proposes using a plastic bag to cover the microphone when not in use to prevent dust, while another counters that this could trap moisture and create condensation.
  • There is a suggestion that using a cloth covering may be preferable to a plastic bag, with a specific mention of using a lint-free cotton bag.
  • Participants discuss the use of sponge wind socks as a protective measure, though there is uncertainty about their compatibility with larger condenser microphones.
  • One participant mentions the potential benefits of using a fine mesh pop screen to reduce moisture and protect against saliva during use.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to protect microphones from dust, but there are competing views on the effectiveness of different covering methods and their impact on moisture management. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific compatibility of suggested coverings with different types of microphones, particularly larger condenser models. There are also unresolved considerations regarding the effects of humidity and moisture retention with various covering options.

dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
Studio grade microphones are sensitive to dust. Over time dust can collect on the diaphragm and degrade the sound quality. I've been told that putting a plastic bag over the microphone when it's not in use will prevent this. I've also been told that it is better to use a clothe covering because a plastic bag will promote condensation on the diaphragm.

My view is that the plastic bag will not be totally sealed off. This will mean that the humidity inside and outside the bag will be equal and that the bag will not result in extra condensation on the microphone diaphragm. Am I correct?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
You're pretty much correct on the humidity issue. As a matter of fact, you can help trap moisture in with a plastic bag. Depending on the environment, you can create a little greenhouse with a plastic bag.

We use the standard sponge wind socks on ours. I'm not in the studio end of the business, bu there could possibly be a better way to go which is to look and see if there are piezoresistive microphones you can look into.
 
Yeah, put on one of those plastic sponge "wind sock" things. Don't they come with the mic?
 
I'm not sure if it will work for this particular mic. It's a somewhat large condenser mic.
 
dimensionless said:
I'm not sure if it will work for this particular mic. It's a somewhat large condenser mic.
Just put a cloth bag (Crown Royal bags have a drawstring...) over the mic when not in use. Atually a bag made of lint-free cotton would be better than the nice purple felt. And if someone is using the mic to sing into, use a fine mesh pop screen to sing through - I don't know if it will help keep breath-moisture down (which traps dust and smoke particles) but it will catch the errant gobs of spit. I'm not a studio person, but I performed for many years, and always took really god care of my mics (except for the part about having to play in smokey bars).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
28K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
95K