kent davidge
- 931
- 56
For someone who have just finished the study of the (fundamentals) of Schwarzschild spacetime, what would be the next natural topic to study?
After studying Schwarzschild spacetime, the recommended next steps include reading Hartle's textbook on General Relativity, which is noted for its accessibility to undergraduates. Following this, students should explore Kerr spacetime and Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) spacetime to deepen their understanding of specific solutions. Engaging with problem sets from these texts is crucial, as it reinforces learning, despite the common lack of provided solutions. Keeping a notebook for problem-solving efforts is also advised to track progress and understanding.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, particularly those studying General Relativity, educators seeking structured learning paths, and anyone interested in advanced theoretical concepts in spacetime.
To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)Nugatory said:Depends... what is your goal here?
In this order?PeterDonis said:Kerr spacetime and FRW spacetime
kent davidge said:To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
PAllen said:Study Hartle’s textbook.
Seconding this, I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts. I still have mine from Bergmann’s 1942 textbook, which was the first GR text I studied.George Jones said:Yes, systematically study a textbook like Hartle or Moore, and work half the problems.
The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.PAllen said:I’ll add @ZapperZ ’s recommendation to keep a notebook of your problem solution efforts
kent davidge said:In this order?
kent davidge said:The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.
In the past that was a real issue. However, now you could post your solutions efforts you have any doubts about here, and people would help you confirm or correct them.kent davidge said:The problem is that most textbooks don't give the solutions. So we have no way of checking our attempts.
I once emailed a famous author asking him why they don't give the answers so that we can verify if our solutions are correct, and surprisingly he answered my email. He told me that they want students to learn by attempting to solve the problems, and if they would publish the answers, people tend to read them before they have tried really hard.
You can do that anyway.kent davidge said:To be able to tell friends that I know all of the fundamentals of General Relativity :)
PeterDonis said:once you really understand the material, you won't have to ask if your solution is correct or not;
The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that. I guess it depends on how hard the exercises are. I have some old russian books on electrodynamics with exercises that some of my faculty proffessors had problems with.weirdoguy said:The problem is that sometimes you think you understand, when actually you don't and there is no one there to tell you that.