Energy in the Schwarzschild spacetime

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of energy in the context of Schwarzschild spacetime, particularly focusing on the relationship between energy, momentum, and gravitational effects for objects in free fall near a black hole. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical formulations, and interpretations of kinetic energy in this curved spacetime framework.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the general relation between energy, momentum, and mass in flat spacetime and how it translates to Schwarzschild geometry, proposing a dimensionless form of the energy equation.
  • There are claims regarding the kinetic energy of an object dropped from infinity, with some suggesting it is equal to the energy at the event horizon.
  • Participants raise questions about the definition of kinetic energy and how it is measured, particularly in the context of observers at different radial coordinates.
  • Some argue that the light pulse and a massive object cannot have the same momentum at the event horizon due to their differing natures (null versus massive four-momentum).
  • There are corrections and clarifications regarding the mathematical expressions used, particularly concerning the Schwarzschild radius and the interpretation of energy at infinity.
  • One participant suggests that the energy at infinity difference between two objects can be attributed to differences in kinetic energy, while others challenge the validity of this interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the definitions and measurements of kinetic energy in the context of Schwarzschild spacetime. There is no consensus on how to interpret the energy at infinity or the implications of kinetic energy for objects near the event horizon.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions remain unresolved, particularly concerning the definitions of energy and kinetic energy as measured by different observers. The discussion highlights the complexities of interpreting energy in a curved spacetime framework.

  • #31
pervect said:
Pure tension in the rest frame, the density is zero.

You said

pervect said:
I assume he means that ##T^{00}## has only tension components.

Perhaps you intended to say just ##T## instead of ##T^{00}##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
864
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K