Stupid Buoyancy, this is getting ridiculous.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Stupid
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a buoyancy problem involving a hollow sphere with specified inner and outer radii floating in a liquid. Participants are tasked with determining the mass of the sphere and the density of the material it is made from, given the density of the liquid.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate volume calculations for the sphere, questioning whether to use the outer radius or the difference in volumes between the inner and outer radii. There is also confusion regarding the forces acting on the sphere and the relationship between the weight of the displaced liquid and the weight of the sphere.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the outer radius for volume calculations and have noted the importance of considering the hollow nature of the sphere. There is acknowledgment of mistakes in calculations, particularly regarding the use of squared versus cubed values for radius, but no consensus has been reached on the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is a noted frustration with the problem, indicating that it may be more complex than initially anticipated.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] Stupid Buoyancy, this is getting ridiculous.

A hollow sphere of inner readius 8cm and outer radius 9cm floats half submerged in a liquid of density 800kg/m^3. What is the mass of the sphere and the density of the material it is made from.

[tex]\sum F=0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow mg-F_b=0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow m=\rho*\frac{V_s}{2}[/tex]

Now for the Volume do I use [tex]\frac{4}{3}\pi r^2[/tex]
or

[tex]\frac{4}{3}\pi (r_2^2-r_1^2)[/tex] ?

I thought it would just be the outer radius that was important here. But I have tried BOTH ways and both come out wrong...so I am messing something else here...are there only 2 Forces here?

The answer for mass should be 1.2 kg

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sphere displaces liquid equal to half its volume. You want to take the outer radius to work this out. Now the weight of this displaced liquid is equal to the magnitude of the upthrust supporting the sphere. This means that the weight of the sphere is equal to that of the displaced water. Therefore all you have to do is find the volume of the sphere material and you should be able to find the density. Remember the whole sphere isn't made of that material just a shell.
 
Kurdt said:
The sphere displaces liquid equal to half its volume. You want to take the outer radius to work this out. Now the weight of this displaced liquid is equal to the magnitude of the upthrust supporting the sphere. This means that the weight of the sphere is equal to that of the displaced water. Therefore all you have to do is find the volume of the sphere material and you should be able to find the density. Remember the whole sphere isn't made of that material just a shell.

So shouldn't it just be [tex]m=\rho_l*V=800*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{4\pi}{3}*(.09)^2[/tex]
 
To elaborate more to find the mass of the displaced liquid the volume you want to be using is,

[tex]V=\frac{4}{3} \pi r_1^3[/tex]

then the volume of the sphere material will be given by,

[tex]V=\frac{4}{3} \pi (r_1^3-r_2^3)[/tex]

where [itex]r_1=9cm[/itex] and [itex]r_2=8cm[/itex].
 
Saladsamurai said:
So shouldn't it just be [tex]m=\rho_l*V=800*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{4\pi}{3}*(.09)^2[/tex]

Yes that's correct for the mass of the sphere. If you plug the numbers in you should get the 1.2Kg you are looking for.
 
Kurdt said:
Yes that's correct for the mass of the sphere. If you plug the numbers in you should get the 1.2Kg you are looking for.

But I don't. I get 13.57.:confused:

Casey
 
Oh right just noticed that you're squaring the radius instead of cubing. Amazing how you see what you think you're going to see. Silly me.
 
Kurdt said:
Oh right just noticed that you're squaring the radius instead of cubing. Amazing how you see what you think you're going to see. Silly me.

:smile: Very true! I think that every mistake that I have made for the last two semesters has been of this nature! What a jerk! I am going to make my avatar a dunce cap!

Thanks Kurdt!
Casey
 
Hey no problem. Everyone on this site has made a similar mistake, I guarantee it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K