Determining hydrostatic force on a sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the hydrostatic forces acting on a submerged solid sphere with radius R at a depth h1, using the specific weight of water, γ. The vertical force, F_V, is calculated through integration of differential pressure, yielding F_V = (4/3)πR³γ, representing the buoyant force. The horizontal force, F_H, is concluded to be zero due to symmetry, as the forces cancel out when integrated over the spherical coordinates. The correct approach involves using polar angles and integrating over both θ and φ to accurately assess the forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure and buoyancy principles
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of differential pressure calculations
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly with integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of hydrostatic pressure equations in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about spherical coordinate transformations and their applications
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for solving physics problems
  • Investigate the implications of buoyancy in various geometrical shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering disciplines, particularly those studying fluid mechanics, as well as educators seeking to enhance their understanding of hydrostatic forces on submerged objects.

thebrennus
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A solid sphere with radius ##R## is submerged on water at a depth ##h_1##. Water's specific weight is ##\gamma##.
Determine both horizontal and vertical forces exerted by the water on the surface of the sphere, in terms of ##R## and ##\gamma##.

Homework Equations


My lecturer wants the solution to be achieved by integrating the differential pressure of the sphere, so I believe the only relevant equations are ##F = p A## and ##p = (p_0 + \gamma h)##. I am also assuming ##p_0 = 0##

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by decomposing the resultant force on the surface of the sphere into its vertical and horizontal components, allowing me to write: ##F_V = F \sin\theta## and ##F_H = F \cos\theta##

3.1. The vertical force
So I divide the sphere into differential rings with area ##dA = 2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ##
If ##F_V = F \sin\theta##, then ##dF_V = dF \sin\theta##, but ##dF = p dA## and ##p = (p_0 + \gamma h)##, which yields:
$$dF_V = (p_0 + \gamma h) (2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ) \sin\theta$$
The point where I'm evaluating ##h## is ##h = h_1 + R - R\sin\theta##, so we have:
$$dF_V = \gamma (h_1 + R - R\sin\theta) (2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ) \sin\theta$$
Finally, the vertical force is given by:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 \left[h_1 \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta + R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta - R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin^2\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta\right]$$
Solving the integral we have:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 * (2 R /3) \rightarrow F_V = \frac 4 3 \pi R^3 \gamma$$
Which I believe is the correct answer since it is the buoyancy of a sphere.

3.2 The horizontal force
As far as I know, the method for solving this should be the same as before. The only difference I can see is that the horizontal force is given by ##F_H = F \cos\theta##, so the equation is:
$$F_H = \gamma 2\pi R^2 \left[h_1 \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \cos^2\theta\, d\theta + R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \cos^2\theta\, d\theta - R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos^2\theta\, d\theta\right]$$
Solving the above integral yields:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 * (h_1\frac \pi 2 + R\frac \pi 2) \rightarrow F_V = \pi^2 R^2 \gamma[h_1 + R]$$
However I am pretty sure that this is wrong. Since the whole sphere is submerged there should be forces cancelling themselves out so that the horizontal force should be just zero. Besides, this solution is in terms of ##h_1##, and my lecturer explicitly said the answer shouldn't be in therms of any variables other than ##R## and ##h_1##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you redo your coordinate system and use a standard spherical with ## \theta ## being the polar angle measured from the vertical (upward z) direction and ## dA=2 \pi R^2sin(\theta) \, d \theta ## because of the ## \phi ## symmetry. The angle ## \theta ## will then vary from ## 0 ## to ## \pi ##. The vertical force is the z-component. For the horizontal force, you will need to consider the ## x ## and ## y ## components and integrate over ## \phi ##. The horizontal component will have a ## sin(\theta) ## just as the vertical has a ## cos(\theta) ##, but it is the ## \phi ## integrals that will give you the zero answer for the horizontal (x and y) components. For the vertical (z component), the integral over ## d \phi ## is just ## 2 \pi ##. For the x and y components, the ## sin(\phi) ## or ## cos(\phi) ## terms integrate to ## 0 ## when integrated from ## 0 ## to ## 2 \pi ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: thebrennus
Charles Link said:
I suggest you redo your coordinate system and use a standard spherical with ## \theta ## being the polar angle measured from the vertical (upward z) direction and ## dA=2 \pi R^2sin(\theta) \, d \theta ## because of the ## \phi ## symmetry. The angle ## \theta ## will then vary from ## 0 ## to ## \pi ##. The vertical force is the z-component. For the horizontal force, you will need to consider the ## x ## and ## y ## components and integrate over ## \phi ##. The horizontal component will have a ## sin(\theta) ## just as the vertical has a ## cos(\theta) ##, but it is the ## \phi ## integrals that will give you the zero answer for the horizontal (x and y) components. For the vertical (z component), the integral over ## d \phi ## is just ## 2 \pi ##. For the x and y components, the ## sin(\phi) ## or ## cos(\phi) ## terms integrate to ## 0 ## when integrated from ## 0 ## to ## 2 \pi ##.
Thank you so much for your answer, it does make sense. I didn't really think about the coordinate system before
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K